Which has the lower trailing P/E, LRN or TR?

LRN has the lower trailing P/E: LRN trades at 11.99 and TR at 31.84. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LRN or TR?

Over the past five years, LRN grew revenue faster — LRN at a 10.38% CAGR versus TR at 7.77%.

Does LRN or TR pay a bigger dividend?

TR pays a dividend (0.87% yield), while LRN has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LRN or TR more profitable?

LRN runs the higher net margin — LRN at 13.43% versus TR at 12.99%.

How have LRN and TR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LRN delivered 22.20% and TR delivered 5.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Stride, Inc. (LRN) vs Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR)

A side-by-side comparison of Stride, Inc. and Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 26, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LRN

Stride, Inc.

$3.64B

$85.59Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

$3.11B

$41.39Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LRN vs TR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LRN +642.3% (+22.2%/yr)TR +73.2% (+5.6%/yr)LRN compounded faster over this window

LRN TR

LRN vs TR: by the numbers

•LRN is the larger company ($3.64B vs $3.11B market cap).
•LRN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.99 vs 31.84 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LRN converts more revenue to profit (13.43% vs 12.99% net margin).
•LRN grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.38% vs 7.77% CAGR).
•TR pays a dividend (0.87% yield), while LRN has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LRN	TR
P/E ratio	11.99	31.84
Forward P/E	12.10	29.46
P/S ratio	1.61	4.23
P/B ratio	2.48	3.26
EV / EBITDA	6.66	27.86
FCF yield	8.76%	2.58%

Profitability

Metric	LRN	TR
Gross margin	37.75%	34.89%
Operating margin	17.90%	12.28%
Net margin	13.43%	12.99%
ROE	20.72%	10.02%
ROIC	16.10%	5.71%

Dividends

Metric	LRN	TR
Dividend yield	N/A	0.87%
Payout ratio	N/A	26.28%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LRN	TR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.38%	7.77%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	34.80%	11.64%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	34.09%	9.59%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.88%	10.29%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LRN or TR?: LRN has the lower trailing P/E: LRN trades at 11.99 and TR at 31.84. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LRN or TR?: Over the past five years, LRN grew revenue faster — LRN at a 10.38% CAGR versus TR at 7.77%.
Does LRN or TR pay a bigger dividend?: TR pays a dividend (0.87% yield), while LRN has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LRN or TR more profitable?: LRN runs the higher net margin — LRN at 13.43% versus TR at 12.99%.
How have LRN and TR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LRN delivered 22.20% and TR delivered 5.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LRN analysis Full TR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Stride P/E ratio Tootsie Roll Industries P/E ratio Tootsie Roll Industries dividend yield Stride ROE Tootsie Roll Industries ROE Stride operating margin Tootsie Roll Industries operating margin Stride revenue growth Tootsie Roll Industries revenue growth Stride free cash flow Tootsie Roll Industries free cash flow

Stride & Tootsie Roll Industries appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 26, 2026.