Which has the lower trailing P/E, LRCX or PLTR?

LRCX has the lower trailing P/E: LRCX trades at 51.77 and PLTR at 141.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LRCX or PLTR?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 11.25% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.

Does LRCX or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?

LRCX pays a dividend (0.35% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LRCX or PLTR more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 31.27% versus PLTR at 49.00%.

How have LRCX and PLTR total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LRCX delivered 39.31% and PLTR delivered 45.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

A side-by-side comparison of Lam Research Corporation and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LRCX

Lam Research Corporation

$372.94B

$298.22TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$383.97B

$167.23TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LRCX vs PLTR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

LRCX +835.5% (+45.2%/yr)PLTR +1684.5% (+61.7%/yr)PLTR compounded faster over this window

LRCX PLTR

LRCX vs PLTR: by the numbers

•PLTR is the larger company ($383.97B vs $372.94B market cap).
•LRCX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (51.77 vs 141.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (49.00% vs 31.27% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (35.90% vs 11.25% CAGR).
•LRCX pays a dividend (0.35% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LRCX	PLTR
P/E ratio	51.77	141.72
Forward P/E	31.43	104.86
P/S ratio	16.05	62.37
P/B ratio	29.91	39.28
EV / EBITDA	42.99	143.52
FCF yield	1.21%	0.87%

Profitability

Metric	LRCX	PLTR
Gross margin	50.47%	84.80%
Operating margin	35.29%	31.59%
Net margin	31.27%	49.00%
ROE	58.26%	30.86%
ROIC	40.77%	25.60%

Dividends

Metric	LRCX	PLTR
Dividend yield	0.35%	N/A
Payout ratio	18.06%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LRCX	PLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.25%	35.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.30%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	12.22%	122.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	39.31%	45.36%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LRCX or PLTR?: LRCX has the lower trailing P/E: LRCX trades at 51.77 and PLTR at 141.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LRCX or PLTR?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 11.25% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.
Does LRCX or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?: LRCX pays a dividend (0.35% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LRCX or PLTR more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 31.27% versus PLTR at 49.00%.
How have LRCX and PLTR total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LRCX delivered 39.31% and PLTR delivered 45.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LRCX analysis Full PLTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lam Research P/E ratio Palantir Technologies P/E ratio Lam Research dividend yield Lam Research ROE Palantir Technologies ROE Lam Research operating margin Palantir Technologies operating margin Lam Research revenue growth Palantir Technologies revenue growth Lam Research free cash flow Palantir Technologies free cash flow

Lam Research & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.