Is LRCX or PLTR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LRCX is cheaper: LRCX trades at a 69.21 P/E and PLTR at 142.21.

Which has grown faster, LRCX or PLTR?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 10.31% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.

Does LRCX or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?

LRCX pays a dividend (0.28% yield) while PLTR does not currently pay one.

Is LRCX or PLTR more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 30.94% versus PLTR at 43.67%.

Which has been the better investment, LRCX or PLTR?

Over the past 5-year, LRCX delivered the higher annualized total return — LRCX at 48.10% versus PLTR at 38.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

LRCX leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Lam Research Corporation and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LRCX

Lam Research Corporation

$458.72B

$366.81Technology

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$293.87B

$127.99Technology

Total return — LRCX vs PLTR

growth of $100 · last 6y

LRCX +986.2%PLTR +1247.3%PLTR compounded faster

LRCX PLTR

LRCX vs PLTR: by the numbers

•LRCX is the larger company ($458.72B vs $293.87B market cap).
•LRCX trades at the lower earnings multiple (69.21 vs 142.21 P/E).
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (43.67% vs 30.94% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (34.11% vs 10.31% CAGR).
•LRCX pays a dividend (0.28% yield) while PLTR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, LRCX or PLTR?

Metric tally: LRCX 9 · PLTR 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLRCX(lower P/E)

GrowthPLTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLRCX(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	LRCX	PLTR
P/E ratio	69.21●	142.21
Forward P/E	45.79●	61.52
P/S ratio	21.27●	62.99
P/B ratio	43.57	38.94●
PEG ratio	0.54●	1.13
EV / EBITDA	57.60●	139.60
FCF yield	1.40%●	0.82%

Profitability

Metric	LRCX	PLTR
Gross margin	49.98%	84.07%●
Operating margin	34.26%	38.13%●
Net margin	30.94%	43.67%●
ROE	63.38%●	27.00%
ROIC	34.00%●	17.95%

Dividends

Metric	LRCX	PLTR
Dividend yield	0.28%	—
Payout ratio	24.22%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LRCX	PLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.31%	34.11%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.72%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.28%	94.15%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	43.19%●	38.98%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LRCX or PLTR?: It depends on your goal. value: LRCX (lower P/E); growth: PLTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LRCX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LRCX leads 9 to 6.
Is LRCX or PLTR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LRCX is cheaper: LRCX trades at a 69.21 P/E and PLTR at 142.21.
Which has grown faster, LRCX or PLTR?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 10.31% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.
Does LRCX or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?: LRCX pays a dividend (0.28% yield) while PLTR does not currently pay one.
Is LRCX or PLTR more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 30.94% versus PLTR at 43.67%.
Which has been the better investment, LRCX or PLTR?: Over the past 5-year, LRCX delivered the higher annualized total return — LRCX at 48.10% versus PLTR at 38.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LRCX analysis Full PLTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lam Research P/E ratio Palantir Technologies P/E ratio Lam Research dividend yield Palantir Technologies dividend yield Lam Research ROE Palantir Technologies ROE Lam Research operating margin Palantir Technologies operating margin Lam Research revenue growth Palantir Technologies revenue growth Lam Research free cash flow Palantir Technologies free cash flow

Lam Research & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.