Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) vs Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)
A side-by-side comparison of Lam Research Corporation and Manhattan Associates, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
$298.22TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
$201.82TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LRCX vs MANH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yLRCX +3551.9% (+43.3%/yr)MANH +233.0% (+12.8%/yr)LRCX compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LRCX MANH
LRCX vs MANH: by the numbers
- •LRCX is the larger company ($372.94B vs $11.77B market cap).
- •LRCX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (51.77 vs 57.83 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LRCX converts more revenue to profit (31.27% vs 18.67% net margin).
- •MANH grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.69% vs 11.25% CAGR).
- •LRCX pays a dividend (0.35% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LRCX | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 51.77 | 57.83 |
| Forward P/E | 31.43 | 36.71 |
| P/S ratio | 16.05 | 10.45 |
| P/B ratio | 29.91 | 74.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.99 | 41.45 |
| FCF yield | 1.21% | 3.39% |
Profitability
| Metric | LRCX | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.47% | 54.65% |
| Operating margin | 35.29% | 24.33% |
| Net margin | 31.27% | 18.67% |
| ROE | 58.26% | 133.48% |
| ROIC | 40.77% | 90.92% |
Dividends
| Metric | LRCX | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 18.06% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LRCX | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.25% | 12.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 16.30% | 21.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 12.22% | 19.51% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 39.31% | 4.78% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LRCX or MANH?
- LRCX has the lower trailing P/E: LRCX trades at 51.77 and MANH at 57.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LRCX or MANH?
- Over the past five years, MANH grew revenue faster — LRCX at a 11.25% CAGR versus MANH at 12.69%.
- Does LRCX or MANH pay a bigger dividend?
- LRCX pays a dividend (0.35% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LRCX or MANH more profitable?
- LRCX runs the higher net margin — LRCX at 31.27% versus MANH at 18.67%.
- How have LRCX and MANH total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, LRCX delivered 43.62% and MANH delivered 13.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lam Research P/E ratioManhattan Associates P/E ratioLam Research dividend yieldLam Research ROEManhattan Associates ROELam Research operating marginManhattan Associates operating marginLam Research revenue growthManhattan Associates revenue growthLam Research free cash flowManhattan Associates free cash flow
Lam Research & Manhattan Associates appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.