Which has the lower trailing P/E, LQDT or WOOF?

LQDT has the lower trailing P/E: LQDT trades at 41.12 and WOOF at 158.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LQDT or WOOF?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 16.76% CAGR versus WOOF at 2.70%.

Is LQDT or WOOF more profitable?

LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus WOOF at 0.09%.

How have LQDT and WOOF total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LQDT delivered 15.71% and WOOF delivered -31.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) vs Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF)

A side-by-side comparison of Liquidity Services, Inc. and Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.18B

$37.91Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 11:20 AM EDT

WOOF

Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.

$837M

$2.93Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 11:20 AM EDT

Total return — LQDT vs WOOF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

LQDT +134.3%WOOF -89.9%LQDT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LQDT WOOF

LQDT vs WOOF: by the numbers

•LQDT is the larger company ($1.18B vs $837M market cap).
•LQDT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (41.12 vs 158.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.30% vs 0.09% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs 2.70% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LQDT	WOOF
P/E ratio	41.12	158.29
Forward P/E	25.41	N/A
P/S ratio	2.57	0.14
P/B ratio	5.56	0.73
PEG ratio	0.80	N/A
EV / EBITDA	20.79	10.66
FCF yield	6.29%	27.62%

Profitability

Metric	LQDT	WOOF
Gross margin	45.61%	38.72%
Operating margin	8.37%	2.16%
Net margin	6.30%	0.09%
ROE	13.62%	0.48%
ROIC	11.42%	1.63%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LQDT	WOOF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.76%	2.70%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.73%	6.87%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.73%	-31.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LQDT or WOOF?: LQDT has the lower trailing P/E: LQDT trades at 41.12 and WOOF at 158.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LQDT or WOOF?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 16.76% CAGR versus WOOF at 2.70%.
Is LQDT or WOOF more profitable?: LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus WOOF at 0.09%.
How have LQDT and WOOF total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LQDT delivered 15.71% and WOOF delivered -31.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LQDT analysis Full WOOF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Liquidity Services P/E ratio Petco Health and Wellness P/E ratio Liquidity Services dividend yield Petco Health and Wellness dividend yield Liquidity Services ROE Petco Health and Wellness ROE Liquidity Services operating margin Petco Health and Wellness operating margin Liquidity Services revenue growth Petco Health and Wellness revenue growth Liquidity Services free cash flow Petco Health and Wellness free cash flow

Liquidity Services & Petco Health and Wellness appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 5, 2026.