Is LQDT or WOOF cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LQDT is cheaper: LQDT trades at a 40.74 P/E and WOOF at 140.11.

Which has grown faster, LQDT or WOOF?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 16.76% CAGR versus WOOF at 2.70%.

Is LQDT or WOOF more profitable?

LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus WOOF at 0.09%.

Which has been the better investment, LQDT or WOOF?

Over the past 5-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — LQDT at 18.03% versus WOOF at -34.82%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) vs Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (WOOF)

LQDT leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Liquidity Services, Inc. and Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.18B

$37.89Consumer Cyclical

WOOF

Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc.

$748M

$2.62Consumer Cyclical

Total return — LQDT vs WOOF

growth of $100 · last 5y

LQDT +111.0%WOOF -91.1%LQDT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LQDT WOOF

LQDT vs WOOF: by the numbers

•LQDT is the larger company ($1.18B vs $748M market cap).
•LQDT trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.74 vs 140.11 P/E).
•LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.30% vs 0.09% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs 2.70% CAGR).

Which is better, LQDT or WOOF?

Metric tally: LQDT 9 · WOOF 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLQDT(lower P/E)

GrowthLQDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLQDT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LQDT	WOOF
P/E ratio	40.74●	140.11
Forward P/E	25.18	—
P/S ratio	2.55	0.12●
P/B ratio	5.51	0.64●
PEG ratio	0.80	—
EV / EBITDA	18.87	10.16●
FCF yield	6.35%	31.25%●

Profitability

Metric	LQDT	WOOF
Gross margin	45.61%●	38.72%
Operating margin	8.37%●	2.16%
Net margin	6.30%●	0.09%
ROE	13.62%●	0.48%
ROIC	11.42%●	1.63%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LQDT	WOOF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.76%●	2.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.58%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.73%●	-0.41%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.56%●	-34.82%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LQDT or WOOF?: It depends on your goal. value: LQDT (lower P/E); growth: LQDT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LQDT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LQDT leads 9 to 4.
Is LQDT or WOOF cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LQDT is cheaper: LQDT trades at a 40.74 P/E and WOOF at 140.11.
Which has grown faster, LQDT or WOOF?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 16.76% CAGR versus WOOF at 2.70%.
Is LQDT or WOOF more profitable?: LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus WOOF at 0.09%.
Which has been the better investment, LQDT or WOOF?: Over the past 5-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — LQDT at 18.03% versus WOOF at -34.82%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LQDT analysis Full WOOF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Liquidity Services P/E ratio Petco Health and Wellness P/E ratio Liquidity Services dividend yield Petco Health and Wellness dividend yield Liquidity Services ROE Petco Health and Wellness ROE Liquidity Services operating margin Petco Health and Wellness operating margin Liquidity Services revenue growth Petco Health and Wellness revenue growth Liquidity Services free cash flow Petco Health and Wellness free cash flow

Liquidity Services & Petco Health and Wellness appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.