Which has the lower trailing P/E, LQDT or TRS?

TRS has the lower trailing P/E: LQDT trades at 40.70 and TRS at 1.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LQDT or TRS?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 15.03% CAGR versus TRS at -1.15%.

Does LQDT or TRS pay a bigger dividend?

TRS pays a dividend (0.41% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LQDT or TRS more profitable?

TRS runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.79% versus TRS at 117.92%.

How have LQDT and TRS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LQDT delivered 15.27% and TRS delivered 8.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) vs TriMas Corporation (TRS)

A side-by-side comparison of Liquidity Services, Inc. and TriMas Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.29B

$41.51Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TRS

TriMas Corporation

$1.40B

$38.97Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LQDT vs TRS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LQDT +284.5% (+14.4%/yr)TRS +120.7% (+8.2%/yr)LQDT compounded faster over this window

LQDT TRS

LQDT vs TRS: by the numbers

•TRS is the larger company ($1.40B vs $1.29B market cap).
•TRS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (1.62 vs 40.70 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TRS converts more revenue to profit (117.92% vs 6.79% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.03% vs -1.15% CAGR).
•TRS pays a dividend (0.41% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LQDT	TRS
P/E ratio	40.70	1.62
Forward P/E	22.56	23.59
P/S ratio	2.64	1.82
P/B ratio	5.49	0.97
EV / EBITDA	19.91	4.28
FCF yield	6.95%	11.76%

Profitability

Metric	LQDT	TRS
Gross margin	46.56%	21.59%
Operating margin	9.00%	5.43%
Net margin	6.79%	117.92%
ROE	14.10%	62.75%
ROIC	11.85%	2.12%

Dividends

Metric	LQDT	TRS
Dividend yield	N/A	0.41%
Payout ratio	N/A	0.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LQDT	TRS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.03%	-1.15%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.39%	-4.49%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.55%	4.11%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LQDT or TRS?: TRS has the lower trailing P/E: LQDT trades at 40.70 and TRS at 1.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LQDT or TRS?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 15.03% CAGR versus TRS at -1.15%.
Does LQDT or TRS pay a bigger dividend?: TRS pays a dividend (0.41% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LQDT or TRS more profitable?: TRS runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.79% versus TRS at 117.92%.
How have LQDT and TRS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LQDT delivered 15.27% and TRS delivered 8.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LQDT analysis Full TRS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Liquidity Services P/E ratio TriMas P/E ratio TriMas dividend yield Liquidity Services ROE TriMas ROE Liquidity Services operating margin TriMas operating margin Liquidity Services revenue growth TriMas revenue growth Liquidity Services free cash flow TriMas free cash flow

Liquidity Services & TriMas appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.