Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) vs Thor Industries, Inc. (THO)
LQDT leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though THO is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Liquidity Services, Inc. and Thor Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
$37.94Consumer Cyclical
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.
$77.17Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LQDT vs THO
growth of $100 · last 20yLQDT +208.7%THO +77.4%LQDT compounded faster
LQDT THO
LQDT vs THO: by the numbers
- •THO is the larger company ($4.02B vs $1.18B market cap).
- •THO trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.53 vs 40.80 P/E).
- •LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.30% vs 2.66% net margin).
- •LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs -2.33% CAGR).
- •THO pays a dividend (2.67% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
Which is better, LQDT or THO?
Metric tally: LQDT 10 · THO 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTHO(lower P/E)
GrowthLQDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLQDT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LQDT | THO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.80 | 15.53● |
| Forward P/E | 25.21 | 21.84● |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 0.41● |
| P/B ratio | 5.52 | 0.94● |
| PEG ratio | 0.80● | 4.08 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.90 | 7.32● |
| FCF yield | 6.35%● | 4.94% |
Profitability
| Metric | LQDT | THO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.61%● | 12.34% |
| Operating margin | 8.37%● | 2.54% |
| Net margin | 6.30%● | 2.66% |
| ROE | 13.62%● | 6.04% |
| ROIC | 11.42%● | 4.72% |
Dividends
| Metric | LQDT | THO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.67% |
| Payout ratio | — | 42.30% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LQDT | THO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.76%● | -2.33% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.58% | 3.81%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.73%● | -11.52% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.63%● | -5.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LQDT or THO?
- It depends on your goal. value: THO (lower P/E); growth: LQDT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LQDT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LQDT leads 10 to 6.
- Is LQDT or THO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, THO is cheaper: LQDT trades at a 40.80 P/E and THO at 15.53.
- Which has grown faster, LQDT or THO?
- Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — LQDT at a 16.76% CAGR versus THO at -2.33%.
- Does LQDT or THO pay a bigger dividend?
- THO pays a dividend (2.67% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
- Is LQDT or THO more profitable?
- LQDT runs the higher net margin — LQDT at 6.30% versus THO at 2.66%.
- Which has been the better investment, LQDT or THO?
- Over the past 10-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — LQDT at 18.06% versus THO at 3.50%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Liquidity Services P/E ratioThor Industries P/E ratioLiquidity Services dividend yieldThor Industries dividend yieldLiquidity Services ROEThor Industries ROELiquidity Services operating marginThor Industries operating marginLiquidity Services revenue growthThor Industries revenue growthLiquidity Services free cash flowThor Industries free cash flow
Liquidity Services & Thor Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.