Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) vs NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS)

A side-by-side comparison of Liquidia Corporation and NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — LQDA vs NAMS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
LQDA +712.9% (+41.8%/yr)NAMS +114.9% (+13.6%/yr)LQDA compounded faster over this window
01k2kStart $10020222023202420252026$813$215
LQDA NAMS

LQDA vs NAMS: by the numbers

  • •NAMS is the larger company ($2.60B vs $2.30B market cap).
  • •LQDA is profitable (30.74% net margin) while NAMS runs a net loss (-3644.21%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricLQDANAMS
P/E ratio18.92N/A
Forward P/E10.42N/A
P/S ratio5.11365.60
P/B ratio11.814.12
EV / EBITDA12.62N/A
FCF yield2.63%N/A

Profitability

MetricLQDANAMS
Gross margin92.48%92.15%
Operating margin-32.45%-1002.90%
Net margin30.74%-3644.21%
ROE71.04%-41.10%
ROIC46.99%-38.70%

Growth (annualized)

MetricLQDANAMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)128.77%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)59.01%18.30%

Frequently asked

Is LQDA or NAMS more profitable?
LQDA runs the higher net margin — LQDA at 30.74% versus NAMS at -3644.21%.
How have LQDA and NAMS total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, LQDA delivered 59.01% and NAMS delivered 18.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.