Which has grown faster, LPTH or NNDM?

Over the past five years, NNDM grew revenue faster — LPTH at a 9.85% CAGR versus NNDM at 101.92%.

Which has been the better investment, LPTH or NNDM?

Over the past 10-year, LPTH delivered the higher annualized total return — LPTH at 22.21% versus NNDM at -32.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) vs Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM)

NNDM leads on 5 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of LightPath Technologies, Inc. and Nano Dimension Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LPTH

LightPath Technologies, Inc.

Total return — LPTH vs NNDM

growth of $100 · last 10y

LPTH +309.9%NNDM -98.3%LPTH compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LPTH NNDM

LPTH vs NNDM: by the numbers

•LPTH is the larger company ($607M vs $287M market cap).
•Both run net losses; LPTH's is the smaller (-37.38% vs -286.76% net margin).
•NNDM grew revenue faster over the past five years (101.92% vs 9.85% CAGR).

Which is better, LPTH or NNDM?

Metric tally: LPTH 4 · NNDM 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthNNDM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNNDM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LPTH	NNDM
P/S ratio	12.72	2.42●
P/B ratio	7.07	0.59●

Profitability

Metric	LPTH	NNDM
Gross margin	32.10%	34.08%●
Operating margin	-14.40%●	-91.42%
Net margin	-37.38%●	-286.76%
ROE	-20.78%●	-69.51%
ROIC	-17.90%	-14.30%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LPTH	NNDM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.85%	101.92%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.65%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-39.42%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	37.14%●	-30.78%

Frequently asked

Which is better, LPTH or NNDM?: It depends on your goal. growth: NNDM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NNDM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NNDM leads 5 to 4.
Which has grown faster, LPTH or NNDM?: Over the past five years, NNDM grew revenue faster — LPTH at a 9.85% CAGR versus NNDM at 101.92%.
Which has been the better investment, LPTH or NNDM?: Over the past 10-year, LPTH delivered the higher annualized total return — LPTH at 22.21% versus NNDM at -32.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LPTH analysis Full NNDM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

LightPath Technologies P/E ratio Nano Dimension P/E ratio LightPath Technologies dividend yield Nano Dimension dividend yield LightPath Technologies ROE Nano Dimension ROE LightPath Technologies operating margin Nano Dimension operating margin LightPath Technologies revenue growth Nano Dimension revenue growth LightPath Technologies free cash flow Nano Dimension free cash flow

LightPath Technologies & Nano Dimension appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.