Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) vs Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)
LOW leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Starbucks Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
$220.78Consumer Cyclical
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
$103.04Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LOW vs SBUX
growth of $100 · last 30yLOW +4668.5%SBUX +6070.1%SBUX compounded faster
LOW SBUX
LOW vs SBUX: by the numbers
- •LOW is the larger company ($123.79B vs $117.43B market cap).
- •LOW trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.66 vs 78.06 P/E).
- •LOW converts more revenue to profit (7.51% vs 3.89% net margin).
- •SBUX grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.03% vs -1.28% CAGR).
- •SBUX pays the higher dividend yield (2.40% vs 2.17%).
Which is better, LOW or SBUX?
Metric tally: LOW 11 · SBUX 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLOW(lower P/E)
GrowthSBUX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSBUX(higher dividend yield)
QualityLOW(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | LOW | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.66● | 78.06 |
| Forward P/E | 16.43● | 33.69 |
| P/S ratio | 1.40● | 3.06 |
| PEG ratio | 1.36 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.38● | 26.21 |
| FCF yield | 6.16%● | 2.31% |
Profitability
| Metric | LOW | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.80%● | 20.36% |
| Operating margin | 11.55%● | 9.28% |
| Net margin | 7.51%● | 3.89% |
| ROE | -67.10% | -22.93%● |
| ROIC | 20.42%● | 8.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | LOW | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | 2.40%● |
| Payout ratio | 40.44% | 151.53% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LOW | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.28% | 10.03%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.72%● | -9.42% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -3.63% | 2.00%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.93%● | 0.57% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LOW or SBUX?
- It depends on your goal. value: LOW (lower P/E); growth: SBUX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SBUX (higher dividend yield); quality: LOW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LOW leads 11 to 4.
- Is LOW or SBUX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LOW is cheaper: LOW trades at a 18.66 P/E and SBUX at 78.06.
- Which has grown faster, LOW or SBUX?
- Over the past five years, SBUX grew revenue faster — LOW at a -1.28% CAGR versus SBUX at 10.03%.
- Does LOW or SBUX pay a bigger dividend?
- LOW yields 2.17% and SBUX yields 2.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LOW or SBUX more profitable?
- LOW runs the higher net margin — LOW at 7.51% versus SBUX at 3.89%.
- Which has been the better investment, LOW or SBUX?
- Over the past 10-year, LOW delivered the higher annualized total return — LOW at 12.99% versus SBUX at 8.80%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lowe's Companies P/E ratioStarbucks P/E ratioLowe's Companies dividend yieldStarbucks dividend yieldLowe's Companies ROEStarbucks ROELowe's Companies operating marginStarbucks operating marginLowe's Companies revenue growthStarbucks revenue growthLowe's Companies free cash flowStarbucks free cash flow
Lowe's Companies & Starbucks appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.