Which has the lower trailing P/E, LOVE or SGC?

LOVE has the lower trailing P/E: LOVE trades at 12.07 and SGC at 23.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LOVE or SGC?

Over the past five years, LOVE grew revenue faster — LOVE at a 12.34% CAGR versus SGC at 1.04%.

Does LOVE or SGC pay a bigger dividend?

SGC pays a dividend (4.30% yield), while LOVE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LOVE or SGC more profitable?

LOVE runs the higher net margin — LOVE at 2.56% versus SGC at 1.44%.

How have LOVE and SGC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LOVE delivered -26.85% and SGC delivered -7.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Lovesac Company (LOVE) vs Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC)

A side-by-side comparison of The Lovesac Company and Superior Group of Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LOVE

The Lovesac Company

$216M

$14.73Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT

SGC

Superior Group of Companies, Inc.

$203M

$12.99Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT

Total return — LOVE vs SGC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

LOVE -38.2% (-5.8%/yr)SGC -16.1% (-2.2%/yr)SGC compounded faster over this window

LOVE SGC

LOVE vs SGC: by the numbers

•LOVE is the larger company ($216M vs $203M market cap).
•LOVE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.07 vs 23.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LOVE converts more revenue to profit (2.56% vs 1.44% net margin).
•LOVE grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.34% vs 1.04% CAGR).
•SGC pays a dividend (4.30% yield), while LOVE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LOVE	SGC
P/E ratio	12.07	23.62
Forward P/E	13.25	21.21
P/S ratio	0.31	0.35
P/B ratio	1.03	1.05
EV / EBITDA	8.69	10.89
FCF yield	20.73%	15.45%

Profitability

Metric	LOVE	SGC
Gross margin	58.23%	37.57%
Operating margin	3.25%	2.30%
Net margin	2.56%	1.44%
ROE	8.52%	4.27%
ROIC	6.03%	3.69%

Dividends

Metric	LOVE	SGC
Dividend yield	N/A	4.30%
Payout ratio	N/A	101.82%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LOVE	SGC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.34%	1.04%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-22.62%	-29.61%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.84%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-26.85%	-7.63%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LOVE or SGC?: LOVE has the lower trailing P/E: LOVE trades at 12.07 and SGC at 23.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LOVE or SGC?: Over the past five years, LOVE grew revenue faster — LOVE at a 12.34% CAGR versus SGC at 1.04%.
Does LOVE or SGC pay a bigger dividend?: SGC pays a dividend (4.30% yield), while LOVE has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LOVE or SGC more profitable?: LOVE runs the higher net margin — LOVE at 2.56% versus SGC at 1.44%.
How have LOVE and SGC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LOVE delivered -26.85% and SGC delivered -7.63% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LOVE analysis Full SGC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lovesac P/E ratio Superior Group of Companies P/E ratio Superior Group of Companies dividend yield Lovesac ROE Superior Group of Companies ROE Lovesac operating margin Superior Group of Companies operating margin Lovesac revenue growth Superior Group of Companies revenue growth Lovesac free cash flow Superior Group of Companies free cash flow

Lovesac & Superior Group of Companies appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.