Which has the lower trailing P/E, LOCO or MNRO?

LOCO has the lower trailing P/E: LOCO trades at 12.30 and MNRO at 62.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LOCO or MNRO?

Over the past five years, LOCO grew revenue faster — LOCO at a 2.11% CAGR versus MNRO at -1.30%.

Does LOCO or MNRO pay a bigger dividend?

MNRO pays a dividend (8.13% yield), while LOCO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is LOCO or MNRO more profitable?

LOCO runs the higher net margin — LOCO at 6.96% versus MNRO at 0.71%.

How have LOCO and MNRO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LOCO delivered 3.38% and MNRO delivered -11.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) vs Monro Inc. (MNRO)

A side-by-side comparison of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. and Monro Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LOCO

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.

$438M

$14.39Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MNRO

Monro Inc.

$427M

$13.67Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LOCO vs MNRO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LOCO +41.6% (+3.5%/yr)MNRO -70.2% (-11.4%/yr)LOCO compounded faster over this window

LOCO MNRO

LOCO vs MNRO: by the numbers

•LOCO is the larger company ($438M vs $427M market cap).
•LOCO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.30 vs 62.14 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LOCO converts more revenue to profit (6.96% vs 0.71% net margin).
•LOCO grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.11% vs -1.30% CAGR).
•MNRO pays a dividend (8.13% yield), while LOCO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LOCO	MNRO
P/E ratio	12.30	62.14
Forward P/E	14.02	127.51
PEG ratio	2.13	N/A
P/S ratio	0.88	0.37
P/B ratio	1.38	0.73
EV / EBITDA	9.25	9.47
FCF yield	9.36%	2.39%

Profitability

Metric	LOCO	MNRO
Gross margin	28.32%	34.88%
Operating margin	10.58%	3.34%
Net margin	6.96%	0.71%
ROE	11.00%	1.39%
ROIC	7.04%	2.25%

Dividends

Metric	LOCO	MNRO
Dividend yield	N/A	8.13%
Payout ratio	N/A	509.09%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LOCO	MNRO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.11%	-1.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.39%	-51.44%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-5.56%	-40.19%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.27%	-21.47%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LOCO or MNRO?: LOCO has the lower trailing P/E: LOCO trades at 12.30 and MNRO at 62.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LOCO or MNRO?: Over the past five years, LOCO grew revenue faster — LOCO at a 2.11% CAGR versus MNRO at -1.30%.
Does LOCO or MNRO pay a bigger dividend?: MNRO pays a dividend (8.13% yield), while LOCO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is LOCO or MNRO more profitable?: LOCO runs the higher net margin — LOCO at 6.96% versus MNRO at 0.71%.
How have LOCO and MNRO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LOCO delivered 3.38% and MNRO delivered -11.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LOCO analysis Full MNRO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

El Pollo Loco P/E ratio Monro P/E ratio Monro dividend yield El Pollo Loco ROE Monro ROE El Pollo Loco operating margin Monro operating margin El Pollo Loco revenue growth Monro revenue growth El Pollo Loco free cash flow Monro free cash flow

El Pollo Loco & Monro appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.