Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) vs Waste Management, Inc. (WM)
WM leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though LMT is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Lockheed Martin Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$518.26Industrials
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
$231.67Industrials
Total return — LMT vs WM
growth of $100 · last 30yLMT +1166.4%WM +731.6%LMT compounded faster
LMT WM
LMT vs WM: by the numbers
- •LMT is the larger company ($119.49B vs $93.03B market cap).
- •LMT trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.57 vs 33.86 P/E).
- •WM converts more revenue to profit (10.99% vs 6.38% net margin).
- •WM grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.25% vs 2.62% CAGR).
- •LMT pays the higher dividend yield (2.61% vs 1.62%).
Which is better, LMT or WM?
Metric tally: LMT 7 · WM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLMT(lower P/E)
GrowthWM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLMT(higher dividend yield)
QualityLMT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LMT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.57● | 33.86 |
| Forward P/E | 17.63● | 28.59 |
| P/S ratio | 1.62● | 3.72 |
| P/B ratio | 16.29 | 9.44● |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.46 | 15.30 |
| FCF yield | 4.64%● | 3.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | LMT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 9.82% | 32.06%● |
| Operating margin | 9.88% | 18.46%● |
| Net margin | 6.38% | 10.99%● |
| ROE | 64.00%● | 27.88% |
| ROIC | 17.39%● | 8.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | LMT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.61%● | 1.62% |
| Payout ratio | 64.01% | 56.25% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LMT | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.62% | 10.25%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.44% | 13.68%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.69% | 7.28%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.72% | 12.21%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LMT or WM?
- It depends on your goal. value: LMT (lower P/E); growth: WM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LMT (higher dividend yield); quality: LMT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WM leads 8 to 7.
- Is LMT or WM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LMT is cheaper: LMT trades at a 25.57 P/E and WM at 33.86.
- Which has grown faster, LMT or WM?
- Over the past five years, WM grew revenue faster — LMT at a 2.62% CAGR versus WM at 10.25%.
- Does LMT or WM pay a bigger dividend?
- LMT yields 2.61% and WM yields 1.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LMT or WM more profitable?
- WM runs the higher net margin — LMT at 6.38% versus WM at 10.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, LMT or WM?
- Over the past 10-year, WM delivered the higher annualized total return — LMT at 10.58% versus WM at 15.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lockheed Martin P/E ratioWaste Management P/E ratioLockheed Martin dividend yieldWaste Management dividend yieldLockheed Martin ROEWaste Management ROELockheed Martin operating marginWaste Management operating marginLockheed Martin revenue growthWaste Management revenue growthLockheed Martin free cash flowWaste Management free cash flow
Lockheed Martin & Waste Management appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.