Is LMT or VRT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LMT is cheaper: LMT trades at a 24.74 P/E and VRT at 89.94.

Which has grown faster, LMT or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — LMT at a 2.62% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.

Does LMT or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

LMT yields 2.67% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LMT or VRT more profitable?

VRT runs the higher net margin — LMT at 6.38% versus VRT at 14.37%.

Which has been the better investment, LMT or VRT?

Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — LMT at 10.48% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

LMT and VRT are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of Lockheed Martin Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 22, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

LMT

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Total return — LMT vs VRT

growth of $100 · last 8y

LMT +54.6%VRT +3534.1%VRT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LMT VRT

LMT vs VRT: by the numbers

•VRT is the larger company ($137.50B vs $113.97B market cap).
•LMT trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.74 vs 89.94 P/E).
•VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 6.38% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 2.62% CAGR).
•LMT pays the higher dividend yield (2.67% vs 0.06%).

Which is better, LMT or VRT?

Metric tally: LMT 8 · VRT 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLMT(lower P/E)

GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeLMT(higher dividend yield)

QualityVRT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LMT	VRT
P/E ratio	24.74●	89.94
Forward P/E	15.95●	40.70
P/S ratio	1.57●	12.94
P/B ratio	15.77●	33.07
PEG ratio	—	0.28
EV / EBITDA	16.17●	60.77
FCF yield	4.80%●	1.65%

Profitability

Metric	LMT	VRT
Gross margin	9.82%	36.16%●
Operating margin	9.88%	18.54%●
Net margin	6.38%	14.37%●
ROE	64.00%●	36.71%
ROIC	17.39%	18.55%●

Dividends

Metric	LMT	VRT
Dividend yield	2.67%●	0.06%
Payout ratio	63.31%	6.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LMT	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.62%	18.86%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-2.44%	79.41%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.69%	41.85%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.16%	68.02%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, LMT or VRT?: It depends on your goal. value: LMT (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LMT (higher dividend yield); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is LMT or VRT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LMT is cheaper: LMT trades at a 24.74 P/E and VRT at 89.94.
Which has grown faster, LMT or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — LMT at a 2.62% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
Does LMT or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: LMT yields 2.67% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LMT or VRT more profitable?: VRT runs the higher net margin — LMT at 6.38% versus VRT at 14.37%.
Which has been the better investment, LMT or VRT?: Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — LMT at 10.48% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LMT analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lockheed Martin P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Lockheed Martin dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield Lockheed Martin ROE Vertiv ROE Lockheed Martin operating margin Vertiv operating margin Lockheed Martin revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Lockheed Martin free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Lockheed Martin & Vertiv appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 22, 2026.