Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) vs Union Pacific Corporation (UNP)
UNP leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lockheed Martin Corporation and Union Pacific Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$540.33Industrials
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
$272.70Industrials
Total return — LMT vs UNP
growth of $100 · last 30yLMT +1190.2%UNP +2250.9%UNP compounded faster
LMT UNP
LMT vs UNP: by the numbers
- •UNP is the larger company ($161.91B vs $124.58B market cap).
- •UNP trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.46 vs 26.17 P/E).
- •UNP converts more revenue to profit (29.20% vs 6.38% net margin).
- •UNP grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.05% vs 2.62% CAGR).
- •LMT pays the higher dividend yield (2.53% vs 2.02%).
Which is better, LMT or UNP?
Metric tally: LMT 7 · UNP 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUNP(lower P/E)
GrowthUNP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLMT(higher dividend yield)
QualityLMT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | LMT | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.17 | 22.46● |
| Forward P/E | 16.87● | 19.87 |
| P/S ratio | 1.66● | 6.55 |
| P/B ratio | 16.67 | 8.34● |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.97 | 14.73● |
| FCF yield | 4.54%● | 3.52% |
Profitability
| Metric | LMT | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 9.82% | 45.67%● |
| Operating margin | 9.88% | 40.09%● |
| Net margin | 6.38% | 29.20%● |
| ROE | 64.00%● | 37.15% |
| ROIC | 17.39%● | 11.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | LMT | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.53%● | 2.02% |
| Payout ratio | 63.31% | 45.96% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LMT | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.62% | 5.05%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.44% | 8.74%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.69% | 0.04%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.78%● | 6.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LMT or UNP?
- It depends on your goal. value: UNP (lower P/E); growth: UNP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LMT (higher dividend yield); quality: LMT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UNP leads 9 to 7.
- Is LMT or UNP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UNP is cheaper: LMT trades at a 26.17 P/E and UNP at 22.46.
- Which has grown faster, LMT or UNP?
- Over the past five years, UNP grew revenue faster — LMT at a 2.62% CAGR versus UNP at 5.05%.
- Does LMT or UNP pay a bigger dividend?
- LMT yields 2.53% and UNP yields 2.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LMT or UNP more profitable?
- UNP runs the higher net margin — LMT at 6.38% versus UNP at 29.20%.
- Which has been the better investment, LMT or UNP?
- Over the past 10-year, UNP delivered the higher annualized total return — LMT at 11.34% versus UNP at 14.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lockheed Martin P/E ratioUnion Pacific P/E ratioLockheed Martin dividend yieldUnion Pacific dividend yieldLockheed Martin ROEUnion Pacific ROELockheed Martin operating marginUnion Pacific operating marginLockheed Martin revenue growthUnion Pacific revenue growthLockheed Martin free cash flowUnion Pacific free cash flow
Lockheed Martin & Union Pacific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.