Which has the lower trailing P/E, LMT or RYCEY?

RYCEY has the lower trailing P/E: LMT trades at 20.86 and RYCEY at 14.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LMT or RYCEY?

Over the past five years, RYCEY grew revenue faster — LMT at a 2.88% CAGR versus RYCEY at 12.71%.

Does LMT or RYCEY pay a bigger dividend?

LMT yields 2.41% and RYCEY yields 0.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LMT or RYCEY more profitable?

RYCEY runs the higher net margin — LMT at 8.16% versus RYCEY at 26.94%.

How have LMT and RYCEY total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LMT delivered 11.68% and RYCEY delivered 7.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) vs Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY)

A side-by-side comparison of Lockheed Martin Corporation and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LMT

Lockheed Martin Corporation

$130.13B

$563.85IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

RYCEY

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc

$172.00B

$20.64IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — LMT vs RYCEY

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LMT +203.6% (+11.7%/yr)RYCEY +115.5% (+8.0%/yr)LMT compounded faster over this window

LMT RYCEY

LMT vs RYCEY: by the numbers

•RYCEY is the larger company ($172.00B vs $130.13B market cap).
•RYCEY trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.89 vs 20.86 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RYCEY converts more revenue to profit (26.94% vs 8.16% net margin).
•RYCEY grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.71% vs 2.88% CAGR).
•LMT pays the higher dividend yield (2.41% vs 0.39%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LMT	RYCEY
P/E ratio	20.86	14.89
Forward P/E	18.60	47.84
P/S ratio	1.70	6.13
P/B ratio	14.92	45.95
EV / EBITDA	13.61	28.16
FCF yield	6.68%	2.83%

Profitability

Metric	LMT	RYCEY
Gross margin	11.80%	29.12%
Operating margin	11.88%	16.82%
Net margin	8.16%	26.94%
ROE	71.70%	209.94%
ROIC	20.07%	15.14%

Dividends

Metric	LMT	RYCEY
Dividend yield	2.41%	0.39%
Payout ratio	63.31%	8.77%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LMT	RYCEY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.88%	12.71%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-2.44%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.90%	26.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.34%	68.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LMT or RYCEY?: RYCEY has the lower trailing P/E: LMT trades at 20.86 and RYCEY at 14.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LMT or RYCEY?: Over the past five years, RYCEY grew revenue faster — LMT at a 2.88% CAGR versus RYCEY at 12.71%.
Does LMT or RYCEY pay a bigger dividend?: LMT yields 2.41% and RYCEY yields 0.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LMT or RYCEY more profitable?: RYCEY runs the higher net margin — LMT at 8.16% versus RYCEY at 26.94%.
How have LMT and RYCEY total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LMT delivered 11.68% and RYCEY delivered 7.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LMT analysis Full RYCEY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lockheed Martin P/E ratio Rolls-Royce P/E ratio Lockheed Martin dividend yield Rolls-Royce dividend yield Lockheed Martin ROE Rolls-Royce ROE Lockheed Martin operating margin Rolls-Royce operating margin Lockheed Martin revenue growth Rolls-Royce revenue growth Lockheed Martin free cash flow Rolls-Royce free cash flow

Lockheed Martin & Rolls-Royce appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.