Which has the lower trailing P/E, LMB or WDFC?

LMB has the lower trailing P/E: LMB trades at 19.64 and WDFC at 30.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LMB or WDFC?

Over the past five years, WDFC grew revenue faster — LMB at a 5.28% CAGR versus WDFC at 6.85%.

Does LMB or WDFC pay a bigger dividend?

WDFC pays a dividend (1.97% yield), while LMB has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LMB or WDFC more profitable?

WDFC runs the higher net margin — LMB at 4.42% versus WDFC at 13.22%.

How have LMB and WDFC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LMB delivered 15.22% and WDFC delivered 7.76% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) vs WD-40 Company (WDFC)

A side-by-side comparison of Limbach Holdings, Inc. and WD-40 Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LMB

Limbach Holdings, Inc.

$585M

$49.10Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

WDFC

WD-40 Company

$2.72B

$203.02Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LMB vs WDFC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LMB +313.0% (+15.2%/yr)WDFC +110.1% (+7.7%/yr)LMB compounded faster over this window

LMB WDFC

LMB vs WDFC: by the numbers

•WDFC is the larger company ($2.72B vs $585M market cap).
•LMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.64 vs 30.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•WDFC converts more revenue to profit (13.22% vs 4.42% net margin).
•WDFC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.85% vs 5.28% CAGR).
•WDFC pays a dividend (1.97% yield), while LMB has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LMB	WDFC
P/E ratio	19.64	30.85
Forward P/E	12.31	31.36
PEG ratio	0.48	3.53
P/S ratio	0.86	4.04
P/B ratio	2.88	9.78
EV / EBITDA	10.87	21.78
FCF yield	8.65%	2.92%

Profitability

Metric	LMB	WDFC
Gross margin	23.58%	55.82%
Operating margin	5.72%	17.48%
Net margin	4.42%	13.22%
ROE	14.87%	32.01%
ROIC	12.30%	22.75%

Dividends

Metric	LMB	WDFC
Dividend yield	N/A	1.97%
Payout ratio	N/A	60.79%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LMB	WDFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.28%	6.85%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	41.39%	8.73%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	9.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	49.18%	-1.06%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LMB or WDFC?: LMB has the lower trailing P/E: LMB trades at 19.64 and WDFC at 30.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LMB or WDFC?: Over the past five years, WDFC grew revenue faster — LMB at a 5.28% CAGR versus WDFC at 6.85%.
Does LMB or WDFC pay a bigger dividend?: WDFC pays a dividend (1.97% yield), while LMB has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LMB or WDFC more profitable?: WDFC runs the higher net margin — LMB at 4.42% versus WDFC at 13.22%.
How have LMB and WDFC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LMB delivered 15.22% and WDFC delivered 7.76% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LMB analysis Full WDFC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Limbach P/E ratio WD-40 P/E ratio WD-40 dividend yield Limbach ROE WD-40 ROE Limbach operating margin WD-40 operating margin Limbach revenue growth WD-40 revenue growth Limbach free cash flow WD-40 free cash flow

Limbach & WD-40 appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 5, 2026.