Which has the lower trailing P/E, LMB or USLM?

LMB has the lower trailing P/E: LMB trades at 19.64 and USLM at 23.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LMB or USLM?

Over the past five years, USLM grew revenue faster — LMB at a 5.28% CAGR versus USLM at 16.51%.

Does LMB or USLM pay a bigger dividend?

USLM pays a dividend (0.22% yield), while LMB has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LMB or USLM more profitable?

USLM runs the higher net margin — LMB at 4.42% versus USLM at 35.66%.

How have LMB and USLM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LMB delivered 15.22% and USLM delivered 24.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) vs United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM)

A side-by-side comparison of Limbach Holdings, Inc. and United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LMB

Limbach Holdings, Inc.

$585M

$49.10Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

USLM

United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.

$3.18B

$111.01Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LMB vs USLM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LMB +313.0% (+15.2%/yr)USLM +785.4% (+24.4%/yr)USLM compounded faster over this window

LMB USLM

LMB vs USLM: by the numbers

•USLM is the larger company ($3.18B vs $585M market cap).
•LMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.64 vs 23.77 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•USLM converts more revenue to profit (35.66% vs 4.42% net margin).
•USLM grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.51% vs 5.28% CAGR).
•USLM pays a dividend (0.22% yield), while LMB has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LMB	USLM
P/E ratio	19.64	23.77
Forward P/E	12.31	22.03
PEG ratio	0.48	0.66
P/S ratio	0.86	8.45
P/B ratio	2.88	4.58
EV / EBITDA	10.87	15.09
FCF yield	8.65%	2.88%

Profitability

Metric	LMB	USLM
Gross margin	23.58%	48.46%
Operating margin	5.72%	42.11%
Net margin	4.42%	35.66%
ROE	14.87%	19.32%
ROIC	12.30%	16.98%

Dividends

Metric	LMB	USLM
Dividend yield	N/A	0.22%
Payout ratio	N/A	5.14%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LMB	USLM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.28%	16.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	41.39%	36.22%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	21.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	49.18%	36.33%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LMB or USLM?: LMB has the lower trailing P/E: LMB trades at 19.64 and USLM at 23.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LMB or USLM?: Over the past five years, USLM grew revenue faster — LMB at a 5.28% CAGR versus USLM at 16.51%.
Does LMB or USLM pay a bigger dividend?: USLM pays a dividend (0.22% yield), while LMB has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LMB or USLM more profitable?: USLM runs the higher net margin — LMB at 4.42% versus USLM at 35.66%.
How have LMB and USLM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LMB delivered 15.22% and USLM delivered 24.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LMB analysis Full USLM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Limbach P/E ratio United States Lime & Minerals P/E ratio United States Lime & Minerals dividend yield Limbach ROE United States Lime & Minerals ROE Limbach operating margin United States Lime & Minerals operating margin Limbach revenue growth United States Lime & Minerals revenue growth Limbach free cash flow United States Lime & Minerals free cash flow

Limbach & United States Lime & Minerals appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 5, 2026.