Which has the lower trailing P/E, LMB or SWIM?

LMB has the lower trailing P/E: LMB trades at 20.62 and SWIM at 138.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LMB or SWIM?

Over the past five years, LMB grew revenue faster — LMB at a 5.28% CAGR versus SWIM at 2.72%.

Is LMB or SWIM more profitable?

LMB runs the higher net margin — LMB at 4.42% versus SWIM at 0.92%.

How have LMB and SWIM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LMB delivered 49.10% and SWIM delivered -14.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) vs Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM)

A side-by-side comparison of Limbach Holdings, Inc. and Latham Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LMB

Limbach Holdings, Inc.

$615M

$51.56Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:20 PM EDT

SWIM

Latham Group, Inc.

$755M

$6.43Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT

Total return — LMB vs SWIM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

LMB +380.2% (+36.9%/yr)SWIM -76.6% (-25.2%/yr)LMB compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

LMB SWIM

LMB vs SWIM: by the numbers

•SWIM is the larger company ($755M vs $615M market cap).
•LMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.62 vs 138.03 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LMB converts more revenue to profit (4.42% vs 0.92% net margin).
•LMB grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.28% vs 2.72% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LMB	SWIM
P/E ratio	20.62	138.03
Forward P/E	12.93	35.99
PEG ratio	0.50	N/A
P/S ratio	0.90	1.31
P/B ratio	3.03	1.84
EV / EBITDA	11.37	12.43
FCF yield	8.23%	4.90%

Profitability

Metric	LMB	SWIM
Gross margin	23.58%	33.38%
Operating margin	5.72%	5.08%
Net margin	4.42%	0.92%
ROE	14.87%	1.29%
ROIC	12.30%	2.14%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LMB	SWIM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.28%	2.72%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	41.39%	-5.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-3.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	49.10%	-14.94%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LMB or SWIM?: LMB has the lower trailing P/E: LMB trades at 20.62 and SWIM at 138.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LMB or SWIM?: Over the past five years, LMB grew revenue faster — LMB at a 5.28% CAGR versus SWIM at 2.72%.
Is LMB or SWIM more profitable?: LMB runs the higher net margin — LMB at 4.42% versus SWIM at 0.92%.
How have LMB and SWIM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LMB delivered 49.10% and SWIM delivered -14.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LMB analysis Full SWIM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Limbach P/E ratio Latham P/E ratio Limbach ROE Latham ROE Limbach operating margin Latham operating margin Limbach revenue growth Latham revenue growth Limbach free cash flow Latham free cash flow

Limbach & Latham appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.