LKQ Corporation (LKQ) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA)
A side-by-side comparison of LKQ Corporation and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
$22.39Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
$47.05Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LKQ vs RUSHA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yLKQ -22.4% (-2.5%/yr)RUSHA +619.9% (+21.8%/yr)RUSHA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LKQ RUSHA
LKQ vs RUSHA: by the numbers
- •LKQ is the larger company ($5.66B vs $5.48B market cap).
- •LKQ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.44 vs 14.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •RUSHA converts more revenue to profit (3.67% vs 3.37% net margin).
- •RUSHA grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.70% vs 1.66% CAGR).
- •LKQ pays the higher dividend yield (5.36% vs 1.10%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LKQ | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.44 | 14.17 |
| Forward P/E | 8.34 | 19.08 |
| PEG ratio | 5.25 | 1.37 |
| P/S ratio | 0.41 | 0.76 |
| P/B ratio | 0.88 | 2.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.08 | 12.48 |
| FCF yield | 11.03% | 2.29% |
Profitability
| Metric | LKQ | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.66% | 18.98% |
| Operating margin | 6.79% | 5.13% |
| Net margin | 3.37% | 3.67% |
| ROE | 7.15% | 11.38% |
| ROIC | 5.62% | 7.17% |
Dividends
| Metric | LKQ | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.36% | 1.10% |
| Payout ratio | 66.67% | 15.66% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LKQ | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.66% | 7.70% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 2.28% | 19.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.37% | -22.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -12.79% | 19.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LKQ or RUSHA?
- LKQ has the lower trailing P/E: LKQ trades at 12.44 and RUSHA at 14.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LKQ or RUSHA?
- Over the past five years, RUSHA grew revenue faster — LKQ at a 1.66% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.
- Does LKQ or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?
- LKQ yields 5.36% and RUSHA yields 1.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LKQ or RUSHA more profitable?
- RUSHA runs the higher net margin — LKQ at 3.37% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.
- How have LKQ and RUSHA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, LKQ delivered -2.62% and RUSHA delivered 21.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
LKQ P/E ratioRush Enterprises P/E ratioLKQ dividend yieldRush Enterprises dividend yieldLKQ ROERush Enterprises ROELKQ operating marginRush Enterprises operating marginLKQ revenue growthRush Enterprises revenue growthLKQ free cash flowRush Enterprises free cash flow
LKQ & Rush Enterprises appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.