LKQ Corporation (LKQ) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)
A side-by-side comparison of LKQ Corporation and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
$25.86Consumer CyclicalAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
$17.34Consumer CyclicalAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — LKQ vs NCLH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yLKQ -16.9% (-1.8%/yr)NCLH -54.0% (-7.5%/yr)LKQ compounded faster over this window
LKQ NCLH
LKQ vs NCLH: by the numbers
- •NCLH is the larger company ($7.96B vs $6.54B market cap).
- •NCLH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.84 vs 14.37 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NCLH converts more revenue to profit (7.49% vs 3.37% net margin).
- •NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (236.47% vs 1.66% CAGR).
- •LKQ pays a dividend (4.64% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LKQ | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.37 | 10.84 |
| Forward P/E | 9.47 | 10.91 |
| P/S ratio | 0.48 | 0.79 |
| P/B ratio | 1.02 | 3.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.77 | 8.76 |
| FCF yield | 9.49% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | LKQ | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.66% | 31.97% |
| Operating margin | 6.79% | 15.09% |
| Net margin | 3.37% | 7.49% |
| ROE | 7.15% | 29.57% |
| ROIC | 5.62% | 8.01% |
Dividends
| Metric | LKQ | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.64% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 51.06% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LKQ | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.66% | 236.47% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 2.28% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.37% | 35.22% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -10.36% | -5.54% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LKQ or NCLH?
- NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: LKQ trades at 14.37 and NCLH at 10.84. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LKQ or NCLH?
- Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — LKQ at a 1.66% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.
- Does LKQ or NCLH pay a bigger dividend?
- LKQ pays a dividend (4.64% yield), while NCLH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LKQ or NCLH more profitable?
- NCLH runs the higher net margin — LKQ at 3.37% versus NCLH at 7.49%.
- How have LKQ and NCLH total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, LKQ delivered -1.91% and NCLH delivered -7.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
LKQ P/E ratioNorwegian Cruise Line P/E ratioLKQ dividend yieldLKQ ROENorwegian Cruise Line ROELKQ operating marginNorwegian Cruise Line operating marginLKQ revenue growthNorwegian Cruise Line revenue growthLKQ free cash flowNorwegian Cruise Line free cash flow
LKQ & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.