Which has the lower trailing P/E, LKFN or PWP?

LKFN has the lower trailing P/E: LKFN trades at 13.32 and PWP at 52.69. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LKFN or PWP?

Over the past five years, LKFN grew revenue faster — LKFN at a 13.42% CAGR versus PWP at 7.67%.

Does LKFN or PWP pay a bigger dividend?

LKFN yields 3.53% and PWP yields 1.76% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LKFN or PWP more profitable?

LKFN runs the higher net margin — LKFN at 26.04% versus PWP at 3.22%.

How have LKFN and PWP total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, LKFN delivered -1.77% and PWP delivered 5.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) vs Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP)

A side-by-side comparison of Lakeland Financial Corporation and Perella Weinberg Partners across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LKFN

Lakeland Financial Corporation

$1.45B

$58.07Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

PWP

Perella Weinberg Partners

$1.55B

$15.83Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

Total return — LKFN vs PWP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

LKFN +27.5% (+4.1%/yr)PWP +79.0% (+10.2%/yr)PWP compounded faster over this window

LKFN PWP

LKFN vs PWP: by the numbers

•PWP is the larger company ($1.55B vs $1.45B market cap).
•LKFN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.32 vs 52.69 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LKFN converts more revenue to profit (26.04% vs 3.22% net margin).
•LKFN grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.42% vs 7.67% CAGR).
•LKFN pays the higher dividend yield (3.53% vs 1.76%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LKFN	PWP
P/E ratio	13.32	52.69
Forward P/E	13.26	17.20
PEG ratio	3.35	N/A
P/S ratio	3.39	2.26
P/B ratio	1.87	N/A

Profitability

Metric	LKFN	PWP
Gross margin	N/A	97.23%
Operating margin	31.81%	2.84%
Net margin	26.04%	3.22%
ROE	14.38%	N/A

Lakeland Financial Corporation: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	LKFN	PWP
Dividend yield	3.53%	1.76%
Payout ratio	47.25%	93.21%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LKFN	PWP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.42%	7.67%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	3.96%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-1.77%	5.32%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LKFN or PWP?: LKFN has the lower trailing P/E: LKFN trades at 13.32 and PWP at 52.69. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LKFN or PWP?: Over the past five years, LKFN grew revenue faster — LKFN at a 13.42% CAGR versus PWP at 7.67%.
Does LKFN or PWP pay a bigger dividend?: LKFN yields 3.53% and PWP yields 1.76% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LKFN or PWP more profitable?: LKFN runs the higher net margin — LKFN at 26.04% versus PWP at 3.22%.
How have LKFN and PWP total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, LKFN delivered -1.77% and PWP delivered 5.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LKFN analysis Full PWP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lakeland Financial P/E ratio Perella Weinberg Partners P/E ratio Lakeland Financial dividend yield Perella Weinberg Partners dividend yield Lakeland Financial ROE Perella Weinberg Partners ROE Lakeland Financial operating margin Perella Weinberg Partners operating margin Lakeland Financial revenue growth Perella Weinberg Partners revenue growth

Lakeland Financial & Perella Weinberg Partners appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.