Which has grown faster, LIND or PATK?

Over the past five years, LIND grew revenue faster — LIND at a 114.20% CAGR versus PATK at 3.33%.

Does LIND or PATK pay a bigger dividend?

PATK pays a dividend (2.85% yield), while LIND has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LIND or PATK more profitable?

PATK runs the higher net margin — LIND at -2.08% versus PATK at 3.74%.

How have LIND and PATK total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LIND delivered 14.54% and PATK delivered 10.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) vs Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK)

A side-by-side comparison of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and Patrick Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LIND

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.

$2.36B

$35.89Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:55 AM EDT

PATK

Patrick Industries, Inc.

$2.17B

$66.11Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:55 AM EDT

Total return — LIND vs PATK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LIND +305.0% (+15.0%/yr)PATK +172.5% (+10.5%/yr)LIND compounded faster over this window

LIND PATK

LIND vs PATK: by the numbers

•LIND is the larger company ($2.36B vs $2.17B market cap).
•PATK is profitable (3.74% net margin) while LIND runs a net loss (-2.08%).
•LIND grew revenue faster over the past five years (114.20% vs 3.33% CAGR).
•PATK pays a dividend (2.85% yield), while LIND has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LIND	PATK
P/E ratio	N/A	15.70
Forward P/E	184.72	15.57
P/S ratio	2.84	0.55
P/B ratio	N/A	1.92
EV / EBITDA	21.16	8.71
FCF yield	4.63%	5.88%

Profitability

Metric	LIND	PATK
Gross margin	34.73%	23.06%
Operating margin	6.99%	6.74%
Net margin	-2.08%	3.74%
ROE	N/A	13.02%
ROIC	11.40%	7.20%

Dividends

Metric	LIND	PATK
Dividend yield	N/A	2.85%
Payout ratio	N/A	44.66%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LIND	PATK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	114.20%	3.33%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-0.52%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.50%	5.30%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, LIND or PATK?: Over the past five years, LIND grew revenue faster — LIND at a 114.20% CAGR versus PATK at 3.33%.
Does LIND or PATK pay a bigger dividend?: PATK pays a dividend (2.85% yield), while LIND has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LIND or PATK more profitable?: PATK runs the higher net margin — LIND at -2.08% versus PATK at 3.74%.
How have LIND and PATK total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LIND delivered 14.54% and PATK delivered 10.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LIND analysis Full PATK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Patrick Industries P/E ratio Patrick Industries dividend yield Lindblad Expeditions ROE Patrick Industries ROE Lindblad Expeditions operating margin Patrick Industries operating margin Lindblad Expeditions revenue growth Patrick Industries revenue growth Lindblad Expeditions free cash flow Patrick Industries free cash flow

Lindblad Expeditions & Patrick Industries appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.