Which has the lower trailing P/E, LII or UI?

LII has the lower trailing P/E: LII trades at 24.66 and UI at 34.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LII or UI?

Over the past five years, UI grew revenue faster — LII at a 6.48% CAGR versus UI at 12.27%.

Does LII or UI pay a bigger dividend?

LII yields 0.96% and UI yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LII or UI more profitable?

UI runs the higher net margin — LII at 14.89% versus UI at 30.43%.

How have LII and UI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LII delivered 14.38% and UI delivered 29.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lennox International Inc. (LII) vs Ubiquiti Inc. (UI)

A side-by-side comparison of Lennox International Inc. and Ubiquiti Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: LII is classified in Industrials; UI is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

LII

Lennox International Inc.

$18.94B

$544.11IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Ubiquiti Inc.

$32.36B

$534.72TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LII vs UI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 15y

LII +2082.1%UI +3282.1%UI compounded faster

LII UI

LII vs UI: by the numbers

•UI is the larger company ($32.36B vs $18.94B market cap).
•LII trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.66 vs 34.68 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•UI converts more revenue to profit (30.43% vs 14.89% net margin).
•UI grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.27% vs 6.48% CAGR).
•LII pays the higher dividend yield (0.96% vs 0.59%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LII	UI
P/E ratio	24.66	34.68
Forward P/E	22.39	35.38
P/S ratio	3.64	10.56
P/B ratio	15.78	27.19
PEG ratio	1.29	0.34
EV / EBITDA	18.04	28.78
FCF yield	3.45%	2.29%

Profitability

Metric	LII	UI
Gross margin	33.06%	46.02%
Operating margin	19.52%	35.75%
Net margin	14.89%	30.43%
ROE	64.51%	78.37%
ROIC	25.51%	72.62%

Dividends

Metric	LII	UI
Dividend yield	0.96%	0.59%
Payout ratio	23.58%	27.19%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LII	UI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.48%	12.27%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	19.13%	15.17%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.44%	6.21%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.93%	13.32%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LII or UI?: LII has the lower trailing P/E: LII trades at 24.66 and UI at 34.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LII or UI?: Over the past five years, UI grew revenue faster — LII at a 6.48% CAGR versus UI at 12.27%.
Does LII or UI pay a bigger dividend?: LII yields 0.96% and UI yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LII or UI more profitable?: UI runs the higher net margin — LII at 14.89% versus UI at 30.43%.
How have LII and UI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LII delivered 14.38% and UI delivered 29.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LII analysis Full UI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lennox International P/E ratio Ubiquiti P/E ratio Lennox International dividend yield Ubiquiti dividend yield Lennox International ROE Ubiquiti ROE Lennox International operating margin Ubiquiti operating margin Lennox International revenue growth Ubiquiti revenue growth Lennox International free cash flow Ubiquiti free cash flow

Lennox International & Ubiquiti appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.