L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
A side-by-side comparison of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$297.22IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 11:39 AM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$107.18IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 11:40 AM EDT
Total return — LHX vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24yLHX +2503.5%TRI +429.3%LHX compounded faster
LHX TRI
LHX vs TRI: by the numbers
- •LHX is the larger company ($55.37B vs $46.79B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (30.20 vs 33.14 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 7.71% net margin).
- •TRI grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.86% vs 4.38% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (3.82% vs 1.61%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LHX | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.14 | 30.20 |
| Forward P/E | 28.67 | 23.71 |
| P/S ratio | 2.56 | 5.90 |
| P/B ratio | 2.92 | 3.82 |
| PEG ratio | 4.26 | 4.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.84 | 15.80 |
| FCF yield | 4.51% | 4.63% |
Profitability
| Metric | LHX | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.26% | 75.81% |
| Operating margin | 9.93% | 26.66% |
| Net margin | 7.71% | 19.93% |
| ROE | 8.80% | 12.89% |
| ROIC | 5.14% | 10.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | LHX | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 3.82% |
| Payout ratio | 57.18% | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LHX | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.38% | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.68% | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.45% | 9.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 8.16% | 0.65% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LHX or TRI?
- TRI has the lower trailing P/E: LHX trades at 33.14 and TRI at 30.20. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LHX or TRI?
- Over the past five years, TRI grew revenue faster — LHX at a 4.38% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does LHX or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- LHX yields 1.61% and TRI yields 3.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LHX or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — LHX at 7.71% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- How have LHX and TRI total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, LHX delivered 15.59% and TRI delivered 10.05% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
L3Harris Technologies P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioL3Harris Technologies dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldL3Harris Technologies ROEThomson Reuters ROEL3Harris Technologies operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginL3Harris Technologies revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthL3Harris Technologies free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
L3Harris Technologies & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.