Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) vs Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD)
A side-by-side comparison of Labcorp Holdings Inc. and Mettler-Toledo International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$314.23HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MTD
Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
$1,388.38HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — LH vs MTD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29yLH +6363.3%MTD +9148.7%MTD compounded faster
LH MTD
LH vs MTD: by the numbers
- •MTD is the larger company ($28.06B vs $25.77B market cap).
- •LH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.68 vs 31.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MTD converts more revenue to profit (21.40% vs 6.66% net margin).
- •MTD grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.77% vs -1.58% CAGR).
- •LH pays a dividend (0.96% yield), while MTD has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LH | MTD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.68 | 31.29 |
| Forward P/E | 16.71 | 28.63 |
| P/S ratio | 1.77 | 6.63 |
| P/B ratio | 2.86 | N/A |
| PEG ratio | 1.28 | 8.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.89 | 22.98 |
| FCF yield | 5.54% | 2.93% |
Profitability
| Metric | LH | MTD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 27.79% | 57.79% |
| Operating margin | 11.03% | 28.00% |
| Net margin | 6.66% | 21.40% |
| ROE | 10.79% | -3677.41% |
| ROIC | 7.39% | 35.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | LH | MTD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 27.32% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LH | MTD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.58% | 4.77% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -8.00% | 10.81% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -12.63% | 1.98% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.72% | -1.55% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, LH or MTD?
- LH has the lower trailing P/E: LH trades at 26.68 and MTD at 31.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, LH or MTD?
- Over the past five years, MTD grew revenue faster — LH at a -1.58% CAGR versus MTD at 4.77%.
- Does LH or MTD pay a bigger dividend?
- LH pays a dividend (0.96% yield), while MTD has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is LH or MTD more profitable?
- MTD runs the higher net margin — LH at 6.66% versus MTD at 21.40%.
- How have LH and MTD total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, LH delivered 10.44% and MTD delivered 13.22% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Labcorp P/E ratioMettler-Toledo International P/E ratioLabcorp dividend yieldMettler-Toledo International dividend yieldLabcorp ROEMettler-Toledo International ROELabcorp operating marginMettler-Toledo International operating marginLabcorp revenue growthMettler-Toledo International revenue growthLabcorp free cash flowMettler-Toledo International free cash flow
Labcorp & Mettler-Toledo International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.