Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) vs Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD)
LH leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Labcorp Holdings Inc. and Mettler-Toledo International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LH
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
$266.16Healthcare
MTD
Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
$1131.49Healthcare
Total return — LH vs MTD
growth of $100 · last 29yLH +5410.6%MTD +7506.7%MTD compounded faster
LH MTD
LH vs MTD: by the numbers
- •MTD is the larger company ($22.86B vs $21.83B market cap).
- •LH trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.57 vs 26.49 P/E).
- •MTD converts more revenue to profit (21.40% vs 6.66% net margin).
- •MTD grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.77% vs -1.58% CAGR).
- •LH pays a dividend (1.08% yield) while MTD does not currently pay one.
Which is better, LH or MTD?
Metric tally: LH 8 · MTD 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLH(lower P/E)
GrowthMTD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMTD(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | LH | MTD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.57● | 26.49 |
| Forward P/E | 13.65● | 22.12 |
| P/S ratio | 1.56● | 5.61 |
| P/B ratio | 2.53 | — |
| PEG ratio | 1.28● | 8.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.73● | 20.60 |
| FCF yield | 6.27%● | 3.46% |
Profitability
| Metric | LH | MTD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 27.79% | 57.79%● |
| Operating margin | 11.03% | 28.00%● |
| Net margin | 6.66% | 21.40%● |
| ROE | 10.79%● | -3677.41% |
| ROIC | 7.39% | 35.46%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LH | MTD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | — |
| Payout ratio | 27.32% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LH | MTD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.58% | 4.77%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -8.00% | 10.81%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -12.63% | 1.98%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.75%● | -3.11% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LH or MTD?
- It depends on your goal. value: LH (lower P/E); growth: MTD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MTD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LH leads 8 to 7.
- Is LH or MTD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LH is cheaper: LH trades at a 23.57 P/E and MTD at 26.49.
- Which has grown faster, LH or MTD?
- Over the past five years, MTD grew revenue faster — LH at a -1.58% CAGR versus MTD at 4.77%.
- Does LH or MTD pay a bigger dividend?
- LH pays a dividend (1.08% yield) while MTD does not currently pay one.
- Is LH or MTD more profitable?
- MTD runs the higher net margin — LH at 6.66% versus MTD at 21.40%.
- Which has been the better investment, LH or MTD?
- Over the past 10-year, MTD delivered the higher annualized total return — LH at 9.60% versus MTD at 11.59%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Labcorp P/E ratioMettler-Toledo International P/E ratioLabcorp dividend yieldMettler-Toledo International dividend yieldLabcorp ROEMettler-Toledo International ROELabcorp operating marginMettler-Toledo International operating marginLabcorp revenue growthMettler-Toledo International revenue growthLabcorp free cash flowMettler-Toledo International free cash flow
Labcorp & Mettler-Toledo International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.