Largo Inc. (LGO) vs Namib Minerals (NAMM)
A side-by-side comparison of Largo Inc. and Namib Minerals across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LGO
Largo Inc.
$0.48Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:28 AM EDT
NAMM
Namib Minerals
$1.16Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:30 AM EDT
Total return — LGO vs NAMM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yLGO -63.9% (-63.9%/yr)NAMM -88.6% (-88.6%/yr)LGO compounded faster over this window
LGO NAMM
LGO vs NAMM: by the numbers
- •NAMM is the larger company ($63M vs $35M market cap).
- •NAMM is profitable (125.43% net margin) while LGO runs a net loss (-64.72%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LGO | NAMM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 0.76 |
| P/S ratio | 0.28 | 0.76 |
| P/B ratio | 0.27 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 0.55 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 4.87% |
Profitability
| Metric | LGO | NAMM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -20.71% | 41.45% |
| Operating margin | -41.92% | 14.90% |
| Net margin | -64.72% | 125.43% |
| ROE | -61.97% | N/A |
| ROIC | -13.90% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LGO | NAMM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.96% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -45.71% | N/A |
Frequently asked
- Is LGO or NAMM more profitable?
- NAMM runs the higher net margin — LGO at -64.72% versus NAMM at 125.43%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Namib Minerals P/E ratioLargo ROENamib Minerals ROELargo operating marginNamib Minerals operating marginLargo revenue growthNamib Minerals revenue growthLargo free cash flowNamib Minerals free cash flow
Largo & Namib Minerals appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.