Which has the lower trailing P/E, LEN or TPR?

LEN has the lower trailing P/E: LEN trades at 13.00 and TPR at 15.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LEN or TPR?

Over the past five years, TPR grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus TPR at 10.03%.

Does LEN or TPR pay a bigger dividend?

LEN yields 2.51% and TPR yields 1.35% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is LEN or TPR more profitable?

TPR runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus TPR at 19.09%.

How have LEN and TPR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LEN delivered 6.95% and TPR delivered 15.51% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Lennar Corporation (LEN) vs Tapestry, Inc. (TPR)

A side-by-side comparison of Lennar Corporation and Tapestry, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LEN

Lennar Corporation

$20.62B

$83.06Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TPR

Tapestry, Inc.

$22.75B

$112.59Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LEN vs TPR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LEN +99.5% (+7.2%/yr)TPR +342.0% (+16.0%/yr)TPR compounded faster over this window

LEN TPR

LEN vs TPR: by the numbers

•TPR is the larger company ($22.75B vs $20.62B market cap).
•LEN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.00 vs 15.49 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TPR converts more revenue to profit (19.09% vs 4.94% net margin).
•TPR grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.03% vs 6.01% CAGR).
•LEN pays the higher dividend yield (2.51% vs 1.35%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LEN	TPR
P/E ratio	13.00	15.49
Forward P/E	15.16	14.11
P/S ratio	0.63	2.84
P/B ratio	0.95	32.87
EV / EBITDA	11.87	12.07
FCF yield	3.98%	7.97%

Profitability

Metric	LEN	TPR
Gross margin	7.95%	77.82%
Operating margin	6.02%	23.92%
Net margin	4.94%	19.09%
ROE	7.49%	220.73%
ROIC	4.62%	31.15%

Dividends

Metric	LEN	TPR
Dividend yield	2.51%	1.35%
Payout ratio	31.30%	22.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LEN	TPR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.01%	10.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.25%	20.12%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-25.28%	16.74%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.89%	27.15%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LEN or TPR?: LEN has the lower trailing P/E: LEN trades at 13.00 and TPR at 15.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LEN or TPR?: Over the past five years, TPR grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus TPR at 10.03%.
Does LEN or TPR pay a bigger dividend?: LEN yields 2.51% and TPR yields 1.35% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is LEN or TPR more profitable?: TPR runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus TPR at 19.09%.
How have LEN and TPR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LEN delivered 6.95% and TPR delivered 15.51% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LEN analysis Full TPR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Lennar P/E ratio Tapestry P/E ratio Lennar dividend yield Tapestry dividend yield Lennar ROE Tapestry ROE Lennar operating margin Tapestry operating margin Lennar revenue growth Tapestry revenue growth Lennar free cash flow Tapestry free cash flow

Lennar & Tapestry appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.