Lennar Corporation (LEN) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)
RL leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics, though LEN is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Lennar Corporation and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LEN
Lennar Corporation
$93.52Consumer Cyclical
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
$410.11Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LEN vs RL
growth of $100 · last 29yLEN +1184.6%RL +1220.7%RL compounded faster
LEN RL
LEN vs RL: by the numbers
- •RL is the larger company ($25.38B vs $23.22B market cap).
- •LEN trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.64 vs 27.14 P/E).
- •RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 4.94% net margin).
- •RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 6.01% CAGR).
- •LEN pays the higher dividend yield (2.14% vs 0.98%).
Which is better, LEN or RL?
Metric tally: LEN 6 · RL 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLEN(lower P/E)
GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLEN(higher dividend yield)
QualityRL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LEN | RL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.64● | 27.14 |
| Forward P/E | 16.59● | 22.37 |
| P/S ratio | 0.69● | 3.15 |
| P/B ratio | 1.05● | 9.00 |
| PEG ratio | 58.54 | 0.71● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.06● | 18.80 |
| FCF yield | 0.06% | 2.92%● |
Profitability
| Metric | LEN | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.95% | 69.87%● |
| Operating margin | 6.02% | 14.53%● |
| Net margin | 4.94% | 11.60%● |
| ROE | 7.49% | 33.13%● |
| ROIC | 6.62% | 19.62%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LEN | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.14%● | 0.98% |
| Payout ratio | 25.06% | 25.94% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LEN | RL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.01% | 13.01%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | 20.37%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -67.59% | 22.25%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.75% | 30.57%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LEN or RL?
- It depends on your goal. value: LEN (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LEN (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 11 to 6.
- Is LEN or RL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LEN is cheaper: LEN trades at a 14.64 P/E and RL at 27.14.
- Which has grown faster, LEN or RL?
- Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
- Does LEN or RL pay a bigger dividend?
- LEN yields 2.14% and RL yields 0.98% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LEN or RL more profitable?
- RL runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus RL at 11.60%.
- Which has been the better investment, LEN or RL?
- Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — LEN at 8.74% versus RL at 18.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lennar P/E ratioRalph Lauren P/E ratioLennar dividend yieldRalph Lauren dividend yieldLennar ROERalph Lauren ROELennar operating marginRalph Lauren operating marginLennar revenue growthRalph Lauren revenue growthLennar free cash flowRalph Lauren free cash flow
Lennar & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.