Lennar Corporation (LEN) vs PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM)
PHM leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Lennar Corporation and PulteGroup, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
LEN
Lennar Corporation
$93.52Consumer Cyclical
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
$135.81Consumer Cyclical
Total return — LEN vs PHM
growth of $100 · last 30yLEN +1495.9%PHM +3932.6%PHM compounded faster
LEN PHM
LEN vs PHM: by the numbers
- •PHM is the larger company ($26.12B vs $23.22B market cap).
- •PHM trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.13 vs 14.64 P/E).
- •PHM converts more revenue to profit (12.14% vs 4.94% net margin).
- •PHM grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.97% vs 6.01% CAGR).
- •LEN pays the higher dividend yield (2.14% vs 0.77%).
Which is better, LEN or PHM?
Metric tally: LEN 3 · PHM 14It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePHM(lower P/E)
GrowthPHM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLEN(higher dividend yield)
QualityPHM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LEN | PHM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.64 | 13.13● |
| Forward P/E | 16.59 | 13.58● |
| P/S ratio | 0.69● | 1.56 |
| P/B ratio | 1.05● | 2.03 |
| PEG ratio | 58.54 | 0.79● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.06 | 9.37● |
| FCF yield | 0.06% | 6.25%● |
Profitability
| Metric | LEN | PHM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 7.95% | 26.06%● |
| Operating margin | 6.02% | 16.40%● |
| Net margin | 4.94% | 12.14%● |
| ROE | 7.49% | 15.77%● |
| ROIC | 6.62% | 14.25%● |
Dividends
| Metric | LEN | PHM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.14%● | 0.77% |
| Payout ratio | 25.06% | 9.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LEN | PHM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.01% | 7.97%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.25% | 16.65%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -67.59% | -0.71%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.75% | 21.89%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LEN or PHM?
- It depends on your goal. value: PHM (lower P/E); growth: PHM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LEN (higher dividend yield); quality: PHM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PHM leads 14 to 3.
- Is LEN or PHM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PHM is cheaper: LEN trades at a 14.64 P/E and PHM at 13.13.
- Which has grown faster, LEN or PHM?
- Over the past five years, PHM grew revenue faster — LEN at a 6.01% CAGR versus PHM at 7.97%.
- Does LEN or PHM pay a bigger dividend?
- LEN yields 2.14% and PHM yields 0.77% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is LEN or PHM more profitable?
- PHM runs the higher net margin — LEN at 4.94% versus PHM at 12.14%.
- Which has been the better investment, LEN or PHM?
- Over the past 10-year, PHM delivered the higher annualized total return — LEN at 8.74% versus PHM at 23.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Lennar P/E ratioPulteGroup P/E ratioLennar dividend yieldPulteGroup dividend yieldLennar ROEPulteGroup ROELennar operating marginPulteGroup operating marginLennar revenue growthPulteGroup revenue growthLennar free cash flowPulteGroup free cash flow
Lennar & PulteGroup appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.