Which has the lower trailing P/E, LDOS or ZBRA?

LDOS has the lower trailing P/E: LDOS trades at 12.08 and ZBRA at 32.07. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LDOS or ZBRA?

Over the past five years, LDOS grew revenue faster — LDOS at a 5.87% CAGR versus ZBRA at 2.51%.

Does LDOS or ZBRA pay a bigger dividend?

LDOS pays a dividend (1.31% yield), while ZBRA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LDOS or ZBRA more profitable?

ZBRA runs the higher net margin — LDOS at 7.86% versus ZBRA at 9.22%.

How have LDOS and ZBRA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LDOS delivered 13.79% and ZBRA delivered 17.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) vs Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA)

A side-by-side comparison of Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LDOS

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

$16.28B

$129.46TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT

ZBRA

Zebra Technologies Corporation

$16.24B

$340.95TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT

Total return — LDOS vs ZBRA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LDOS +266.5% (+13.9%/yr)ZBRA +400.1% (+17.5%/yr)ZBRA compounded faster over this window

LDOS ZBRA

LDOS vs ZBRA: by the numbers

•LDOS is the larger company ($16.28B vs $16.24B market cap).
•LDOS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.08 vs 32.07 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ZBRA converts more revenue to profit (9.22% vs 7.86% net margin).
•LDOS grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.87% vs 2.51% CAGR).
•LDOS pays a dividend (1.31% yield), while ZBRA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LDOS	ZBRA
P/E ratio	12.08	32.07
Forward P/E	10.45	16.14
P/S ratio	0.92	2.78
P/B ratio	3.08	4.73
EV / EBITDA	9.48	16.49
FCF yield	13.28%	5.57%

Profitability

Metric	LDOS	ZBRA
Gross margin	17.42%	48.90%
Operating margin	11.46%	16.09%
Net margin	7.86%	9.22%
ROE	26.23%	15.69%
ROIC	14.42%	10.35%

Dividends

Metric	LDOS	ZBRA
Dividend yield	1.31%	N/A
Payout ratio	15.76%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LDOS	ZBRA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.87%	2.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.47%	-2.66%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.94%	-3.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.17%	-9.80%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LDOS or ZBRA?: LDOS has the lower trailing P/E: LDOS trades at 12.08 and ZBRA at 32.07. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LDOS or ZBRA?: Over the past five years, LDOS grew revenue faster — LDOS at a 5.87% CAGR versus ZBRA at 2.51%.
Does LDOS or ZBRA pay a bigger dividend?: LDOS pays a dividend (1.31% yield), while ZBRA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LDOS or ZBRA more profitable?: ZBRA runs the higher net margin — LDOS at 7.86% versus ZBRA at 9.22%.
How have LDOS and ZBRA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LDOS delivered 13.79% and ZBRA delivered 17.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LDOS analysis Full ZBRA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Leidos P/E ratio Zebra Technologies P/E ratio Leidos dividend yield Leidos ROE Zebra Technologies ROE Leidos operating margin Zebra Technologies operating margin Leidos revenue growth Zebra Technologies revenue growth Leidos free cash flow Zebra Technologies free cash flow

Leidos & Zebra Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.