Which has the lower trailing P/E, LDOS or ONTO?

LDOS has the lower trailing P/E: LDOS trades at 11.41 and ONTO at 108.55. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, LDOS or ONTO?

Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — LDOS at a 5.87% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.67%.

Does LDOS or ONTO pay a bigger dividend?

LDOS pays a dividend (1.31% yield), while ONTO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is LDOS or ONTO more profitable?

ONTO runs the higher net margin — LDOS at 7.86% versus ONTO at 11.84%.

How have LDOS and ONTO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, LDOS delivered 13.79% and ONTO delivered 29.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)

A side-by-side comparison of Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

LDOS

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

$15.39B

$122.35TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

ONTO

Onto Innovation Inc.

$14.36B

$288.74TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — LDOS vs ONTO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

LDOS +265.5% (+13.8%/yr)ONTO +1240.6% (+29.6%/yr)ONTO compounded faster over this window

LDOS ONTO

LDOS vs ONTO: by the numbers

•LDOS is the larger company ($15.39B vs $14.36B market cap).
•LDOS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.41 vs 108.55 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ONTO converts more revenue to profit (11.84% vs 7.86% net margin).
•ONTO grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.67% vs 5.87% CAGR).
•LDOS pays a dividend (1.31% yield), while ONTO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	LDOS	ONTO
P/E ratio	11.41	108.55
Forward P/E	9.88	35.58
P/S ratio	0.87	12.82
P/B ratio	2.91	7.47
EV / EBITDA	9.10	59.17
FCF yield	14.05%	1.76%

Profitability

Metric	LDOS	ONTO
Gross margin	17.42%	50.36%
Operating margin	11.46%	12.48%
Net margin	7.86%	11.84%
ROE	26.23%	6.90%
ROIC	14.42%	3.42%

Dividends

Metric	LDOS	ONTO
Dividend yield	1.31%	N/A
Payout ratio	15.76%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	LDOS	ONTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.87%	11.67%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.47%	-0.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.94%	15.11%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	7.17%	29.60%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, LDOS or ONTO?: LDOS has the lower trailing P/E: LDOS trades at 11.41 and ONTO at 108.55. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, LDOS or ONTO?: Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — LDOS at a 5.87% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.67%.
Does LDOS or ONTO pay a bigger dividend?: LDOS pays a dividend (1.31% yield), while ONTO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is LDOS or ONTO more profitable?: ONTO runs the higher net margin — LDOS at 7.86% versus ONTO at 11.84%.
How have LDOS and ONTO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, LDOS delivered 13.79% and ONTO delivered 29.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full LDOS analysis Full ONTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Leidos P/E ratio Onto Innovation P/E ratio Leidos dividend yield Leidos ROE Onto Innovation ROE Leidos operating margin Onto Innovation operating margin Leidos revenue growth Onto Innovation revenue growth Leidos free cash flow Onto Innovation free cash flow

Leidos & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.