Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)
LDOS leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — LDOS vs ONTO
growth of $100 · last 20yLDOS +114.5%ONTO +3443.1%ONTO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
LDOS ONTO
LDOS vs ONTO: by the numbers
- •ONTO is the larger company ($16.60B vs $13.47B market cap).
- •LDOS trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.81 vs 155.96 P/E).
- •ONTO converts more revenue to profit (10.33% vs 8.20% net margin).
- •ONTO grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.93% vs 6.37% CAGR).
- •LDOS pays a dividend (1.58% yield) while ONTO does not currently pay one.
Which is better, LDOS or ONTO?
Metric tally: LDOS 10 · ONTO 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLDOS(lower P/E)
GrowthONTO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLDOS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LDOS | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.81● | 155.96 |
| Forward P/E | 9.05 | — |
| P/S ratio | 0.79● | 16.19 |
| P/B ratio | 2.74● | 7.83 |
| PEG ratio | 0.84● | 4.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.37● | 79.04 |
| FCF yield | 13.55%● | 1.43% |
Profitability
| Metric | LDOS | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 17.53% | 48.80%● |
| Operating margin | 12.03%● | 10.53% |
| Net margin | 8.20% | 10.33%● |
| ROE | 28.35%● | 4.99% |
| ROIC | 15.00%● | 5.18% |
Dividends
| Metric | LDOS | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | — |
| Payout ratio | 15.06% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LDOS | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.37% | 11.93%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 20.47% | 34.40%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 12.40%● | 11.03% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.02% | 37.24%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, LDOS or ONTO?
- It depends on your goal. value: LDOS (lower P/E); growth: ONTO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LDOS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LDOS leads 10 to 5.
- Is LDOS or ONTO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LDOS is cheaper: LDOS trades at a 9.81 P/E and ONTO at 155.96.
- Which has grown faster, LDOS or ONTO?
- Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — LDOS at a 6.37% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.
- Does LDOS or ONTO pay a bigger dividend?
- LDOS pays a dividend (1.58% yield) while ONTO does not currently pay one.
- Is LDOS or ONTO more profitable?
- ONTO runs the higher net margin — LDOS at 8.20% versus ONTO at 10.33%.
- Which has been the better investment, LDOS or ONTO?
- Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — LDOS at 10.36% versus ONTO at 33.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Leidos P/E ratioOnto Innovation P/E ratioLeidos dividend yieldOnto Innovation dividend yieldLeidos ROEOnto Innovation ROELeidos operating marginOnto Innovation operating marginLeidos revenue growthOnto Innovation revenue growthLeidos free cash flowOnto Innovation free cash flow
Leidos & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.