SEALSQ Corp (LAES) vs Methode Electronics, Inc. (MEI)
A side-by-side comparison of SEALSQ Corp and Methode Electronics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
LAES
SEALSQ Corp
$2.38TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT
MEI
Methode Electronics, Inc.
$15.73TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT
Total return — LAES vs MEI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3yLAES -78.3% (-39.9%/yr)MEI -61.8% (-27.5%/yr)MEI compounded faster over this window
LAES MEI
LAES vs MEI: by the numbers
- •MEI is the larger company ($558M vs $339M market cap).
- •Both run net losses; MEI's is the smaller (-3.52% vs -187.34% net margin).
- •LAES grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.66% vs -2.50% CAGR).
- •MEI pays a dividend (1.40% yield), while LAES has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | LAES | MEI |
|---|---|---|
| P/S ratio | N/A | 0.53 |
| P/B ratio | 0.49 | 0.84 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 12.34 |
Profitability
| Metric | LAES | MEI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 47.28% | 19.28% |
| Operating margin | -218.08% | 0.46% |
| Net margin | -187.34% | -3.52% |
| ROE | -7.41% | -5.55% |
| ROIC | -8.35% | 0.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | LAES | MEI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.40% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | LAES | MEI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.66% | -2.50% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -17.20% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, LAES or MEI?
- Over the past five years, LAES grew revenue faster — LAES at a 3.66% CAGR versus MEI at -2.50%.
- Does LAES or MEI pay a bigger dividend?
- MEI pays a dividend (1.40% yield), while LAES has no payments in the available dividend history.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.