Which has the lower trailing P/E, L or RF?

RF has the lower trailing P/E: L trades at 13.36 and RF at 12.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, L or RF?

Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — L at a 5.98% CAGR versus RF at 7.34%.

Does L or RF pay a bigger dividend?

L yields 0.23% and RF yields 3.66% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is L or RF more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — L at 10.36% versus RF at 23.33%.

How have L and RF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, L delivered 10.70% and RF delivered 15.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Loews Corporation (L) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

A side-by-side comparison of Loews Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Loews Corporation

$22.39B

$108.79Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Regions Financial Corporation

$25.71B

$30.13Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — L vs RF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

L +186.1% (+11.1%/yr)RF +350.8% (+16.3%/yr)RF compounded faster over this window

L RF

L vs RF: by the numbers

•RF is the larger company ($25.71B vs $22.39B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.30 vs 13.36 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.33% vs 10.36% net margin).
•RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs 5.98% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.66% vs 0.23%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	L	RF
P/E ratio	13.36	12.30
Forward P/E	N/A	11.43
P/S ratio	1.21	2.69
P/B ratio	1.17	1.36

Profitability

Metric	L	RF
Gross margin	46.96%	76.85%
Operating margin	16.58%	29.77%
Net margin	10.36%	23.33%
ROE	10.05%	11.85%

Dividends

Metric	L	RF
Dividend yield	0.23%	3.66%
Payout ratio	3.07%	44.69%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	L	RF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.98%	7.34%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.17%	17.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.71%	13.34%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, L or RF?: RF has the lower trailing P/E: L trades at 13.36 and RF at 12.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, L or RF?: Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — L at a 5.98% CAGR versus RF at 7.34%.
Does L or RF pay a bigger dividend?: L yields 0.23% and RF yields 3.66% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is L or RF more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — L at 10.36% versus RF at 23.33%.
How have L and RF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, L delivered 10.70% and RF delivered 15.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full L analysis Full RF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Loews P/E ratio Regions Financial P/E ratio Loews dividend yield Regions Financial dividend yield Loews ROE Regions Financial ROE Loews operating margin Regions Financial operating margin Loews revenue growth Regions Financial revenue growth

Loews & Regions Financial appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.