Which has the lower trailing P/E, L or RF?

RF has the lower trailing P/E: L trades at 15.15 and RF at 12.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, L or RF?

Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus RF at 7.34%.

Does L or RF pay a bigger dividend?

L yields 0.21% and RF yields 3.43% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is L or RF more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus RF at 23.33%.

How have L and RF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, L delivered 11.64% and RF delivered 17.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Loews Corporation (L) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

A side-by-side comparison of Loews Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Loews Corporation

$24.47B

$118.94Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Regions Financial Corporation

$26.40B

$30.94Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — L vs RF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

L +1006.3%RF +576.3%L compounded faster

L RF

L vs RF: by the numbers

•RF is the larger company ($26.40B vs $24.47B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.63 vs 15.15 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.33% vs 10.22% net margin).
•RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs 5.43% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.43% vs 0.21%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	L	RF
P/E ratio	15.15	12.63
Forward P/E	N/A	11.77
P/S ratio	1.34	2.77
P/B ratio	1.31	1.41
PEG ratio	0.55	0.62

Profitability

Metric	L	RF
Gross margin	46.05%	76.85%
Operating margin	12.62%	29.77%
Net margin	10.22%	23.33%
ROE	9.99%	11.85%
ROIC	3.76%	13.79%

Dividends

Metric	L	RF
Dividend yield	0.21%	3.43%
Payout ratio	3.14%	45.89%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	L	RF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.43%	7.34%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.17%	17.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	17.58%	14.23%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, L or RF?: RF has the lower trailing P/E: L trades at 15.15 and RF at 12.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, L or RF?: Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus RF at 7.34%.
Does L or RF pay a bigger dividend?: L yields 0.21% and RF yields 3.43% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is L or RF more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus RF at 23.33%.
How have L and RF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, L delivered 11.64% and RF delivered 17.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full L analysis Full RF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Loews P/E ratio Regions Financial P/E ratio Loews dividend yield Regions Financial dividend yield Loews ROE Regions Financial ROE Loews operating margin Regions Financial operating margin Loews revenue growth Regions Financial revenue growth Loews free cash flow Regions Financial free cash flow

Loews & Regions Financial appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.