On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: L trades at a 13.77 P/E and RF at 12.20.

Which has grown faster, L or RF?

Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus RF at 7.48%.

Does L or RF pay a bigger dividend?

L yields 0.23% and RF yields 3.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is L or RF more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus RF at 23.13%.

Which has been the better investment, L or RF?

Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — L at 11.00% versus RF at 16.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Loews Corporation (L) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

RF leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Loews Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Loews Corporation

$22.25B

$108.12Financial Services

Regions Financial Corporation

$24.98B

$29.27Financial Services

Total return — L vs RF

growth of $100 · last 30y

L +733.0%RF +54.5%L compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

L RF

L vs RF: by the numbers

•RF is the larger company ($24.98B vs $22.25B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.20 vs 13.77 P/E).
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.13% vs 10.22% net margin).
•RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.48% vs 5.43% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.62% vs 0.23%).

Which is better, L or RF?

Metric tally: L 4 · RF 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRF(lower P/E)

GrowthRF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRF(higher dividend yield)

QualityRF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	L	RF
P/E ratio	13.77	12.20●
Forward P/E	—	11.19
P/S ratio	1.22●	2.64
P/B ratio	1.19●	1.35
PEG ratio	0.55●	0.58

Profitability

Metric	L	RF
Gross margin	46.05%	75.81%●
Operating margin	12.62%	29.48%●
Net margin	10.22%	23.13%●
ROE	9.99%	11.85%●
ROIC	3.76%	13.79%●

Dividends

Metric	L	RF
Dividend yield	0.23%	3.62%●
Payout ratio	3.14%	45.89%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	L	RF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.43%	7.48%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.17%	17.53%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.35%●	10.80%

Frequently asked

Which is better, L or RF?: It depends on your goal. value: RF (lower P/E); growth: RF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RF (higher dividend yield); quality: RF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RF leads 9 to 4.
Is L or RF cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: L trades at a 13.77 P/E and RF at 12.20.
Which has grown faster, L or RF?: Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus RF at 7.48%.
Does L or RF pay a bigger dividend?: L yields 0.23% and RF yields 3.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is L or RF more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus RF at 23.13%.
Which has been the better investment, L or RF?: Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — L at 11.00% versus RF at 16.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full L analysis Full RF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Loews P/E ratio Regions Financial P/E ratio Loews dividend yield Regions Financial dividend yield Loews ROE Regions Financial ROE Loews operating margin Regions Financial operating margin Loews revenue growth Regions Financial revenue growth Loews free cash flow Regions Financial free cash flow

Loews & Regions Financial appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.