Loews Corporation (L) vs Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG)
L leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Loews Corporation and Principal Financial Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
L
Loews Corporation
$108.12Financial Services
PFG
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
$111.12Financial Services
Not enough overlapping price history to compare L and PFG.
L vs PFG: by the numbers
- •PFG is the larger company ($24.00B vs $22.25B market cap).
- •L trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.77 vs 15.92 P/E).
- •L converts more revenue to profit (10.22% vs 10.03% net margin).
- •L grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.43% vs 2.90% CAGR).
- •PFG pays the higher dividend yield (2.87% vs 0.23%).
Which is better, L or PFG?
Metric tally: L 10 · PFG 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueL(lower P/E)
GrowthL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePFG(higher dividend yield)
QualityL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | L | PFG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.77● | 15.92 |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.91 |
| P/S ratio | 1.22● | 1.58 |
| P/B ratio | 1.19● | 2.07 |
| PEG ratio | 0.55● | 17.12 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.51● | 12.76 |
| FCF yield | 9.79% | 14.84%● |
Profitability
| Metric | L | PFG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.05% | 48.68%● |
| Operating margin | 12.62%● | 12.36% |
| Net margin | 10.22% | 10.03% |
| ROE | 9.99% | 13.12%● |
| ROIC | 3.76%● | 0.37% |
Dividends
| Metric | L | PFG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 2.87%● |
| Payout ratio | 3.14% | 59.96% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | L | PFG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.43%● | 2.90% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.17%● | 0.93% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 17.24%● | 10.78% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.35% | 15.40%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, L or PFG?
- It depends on your goal. value: L (lower P/E); growth: L (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PFG (higher dividend yield); quality: L (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, L leads 10 to 5.
- Is L or PFG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, L is cheaper: L trades at a 13.77 P/E and PFG at 15.92.
- Which has grown faster, L or PFG?
- Over the past five years, L grew revenue faster — L at a 5.43% CAGR versus PFG at 2.90%.
- Does L or PFG pay a bigger dividend?
- L yields 0.23% and PFG yields 2.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is L or PFG more profitable?
- L runs the higher net margin — L at 10.22% versus PFG at 10.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, L or PFG?
- Over the past 10-year, PFG delivered the higher annualized total return — L at 11.00% versus PFG at 14.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Loews P/E ratioPrincipal Financial P/E ratioLoews dividend yieldPrincipal Financial dividend yieldLoews ROEPrincipal Financial ROELoews operating marginPrincipal Financial operating marginLoews revenue growthPrincipal Financial revenue growthLoews free cash flowPrincipal Financial free cash flow
Loews & Principal Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.