Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMX or NCLH?

NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: KMX trades at 37.92 and NCLH at 10.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KMX or NCLH?

Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.

Is KMX or NCLH more profitable?

NCLH runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus NCLH at 7.49%.

How have KMX and NCLH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KMX delivered 0.29% and NCLH delivered -7.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CarMax, Inc. (KMX) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)

A side-by-side comparison of CarMax, Inc. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 21, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KMX

CarMax, Inc.

$8.82B

$62.13Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NCLH

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

$7.92B

$17.24Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KMX vs NCLH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

KMX +3.2% (+0.3%/yr)NCLH -55.5% (-7.8%/yr)KMX compounded faster over this window

KMX NCLH

KMX vs NCLH: by the numbers

•KMX is the larger company ($8.82B vs $7.92B market cap).
•NCLH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.77 vs 37.92 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NCLH converts more revenue to profit (7.49% vs 0.84% net margin).
•NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (236.47% vs 2.39% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMX	NCLH
P/E ratio	37.92	10.77
Forward P/E	22.66	11.08
P/S ratio	0.33	0.79
P/B ratio	1.42	3.11
EV / EBITDA	N/A	8.74
FCF yield	11.45%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	KMX	NCLH
Gross margin	10.24%	31.97%
Operating margin	-1.85%	15.09%
Net margin	0.84%	7.49%
ROE	3.64%	29.57%
ROIC	-1.21%	8.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMX	NCLH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.39%	236.47%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-18.18%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.85%	35.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-13.32%	-6.11%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMX or NCLH?: NCLH has the lower trailing P/E: KMX trades at 37.92 and NCLH at 10.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KMX or NCLH?: Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus NCLH at 236.47%.
Is KMX or NCLH more profitable?: NCLH runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus NCLH at 7.49%.
How have KMX and NCLH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KMX delivered 0.29% and NCLH delivered -7.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMX analysis Full NCLH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CarMax P/E ratio Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratio CarMax ROE Norwegian Cruise Line ROE CarMax operating margin Norwegian Cruise Line operating margin CarMax revenue growth Norwegian Cruise Line revenue growth CarMax free cash flow Norwegian Cruise Line free cash flow

CarMax & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 21, 2026.