Is KMX or NCLH cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NCLH is cheaper: KMX trades at a 31.19 P/E and NCLH at 16.23.

Which has grown faster, KMX or NCLH?

Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus NCLH at 208.16%.

Is KMX or NCLH more profitable?

NCLH runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus NCLH at 5.66%.

Which has been the better investment, KMX or NCLH?

Over the past 10-year, KMX delivered the higher annualized total return — KMX at 0.07% versus NCLH at -7.41%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CarMax, Inc. (KMX) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)

NCLH leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of CarMax, Inc. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 7, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

KMX

CarMax, Inc.

$7.40B

$52.14Consumer Cyclical

NCLH

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.

$8.69B

$18.92Consumer Cyclical

Total return — KMX vs NCLH

growth of $100 · last 13y

KMX +32.7%NCLH -24.2%KMX compounded faster

KMX NCLH

KMX vs NCLH: by the numbers

•NCLH is the larger company ($8.69B vs $7.40B market cap).
•NCLH trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.23 vs 31.19 P/E).
•NCLH converts more revenue to profit (5.66% vs 0.84% net margin).
•NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (208.16% vs 2.39% CAGR).

Which is better, KMX or NCLH?

Metric tally: KMX 3 · NCLH 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNCLH(lower P/E)

GrowthNCLH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNCLH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMX	NCLH
P/E ratio	31.19	16.23●
Forward P/E	18.64	11.66●
P/S ratio	0.27●	0.89
P/B ratio	1.17●	3.69
EV / EBITDA	—	9.06
FCF yield	13.93%	—

Profitability

Metric	KMX	NCLH
Gross margin	10.24%	31.97%●
Operating margin	-1.85%	15.88%●
Net margin	0.84%	5.66%●
ROE	3.64%	23.37%●
ROIC	-1.10%	8.75%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMX	NCLH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.39%	208.16%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-18.18%●	-22.47%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.85%	35.22%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-17.98%	-7.03%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, KMX or NCLH?: It depends on your goal. value: NCLH (lower P/E); growth: NCLH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NCLH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NCLH leads 10 to 3.
Is KMX or NCLH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NCLH is cheaper: KMX trades at a 31.19 P/E and NCLH at 16.23.
Which has grown faster, KMX or NCLH?: Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus NCLH at 208.16%.
Is KMX or NCLH more profitable?: NCLH runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus NCLH at 5.66%.
Which has been the better investment, KMX or NCLH?: Over the past 10-year, KMX delivered the higher annualized total return — KMX at 0.07% versus NCLH at -7.41%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMX analysis Full NCLH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CarMax P/E ratio Norwegian Cruise Line P/E ratio CarMax dividend yield Norwegian Cruise Line dividend yield CarMax ROE Norwegian Cruise Line ROE CarMax operating margin Norwegian Cruise Line operating margin CarMax revenue growth Norwegian Cruise Line revenue growth CarMax free cash flow Norwegian Cruise Line free cash flow

CarMax & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 7, 2026.