Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMX or MUSA?

MUSA has the lower trailing P/E: KMX trades at 37.22 and MUSA at 17.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KMX or MUSA?

Over the past five years, MUSA grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus MUSA at 9.42%.

Does KMX or MUSA pay a bigger dividend?

MUSA pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while KMX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is KMX or MUSA more profitable?

MUSA runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus MUSA at 2.87%.

How have KMX and MUSA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KMX delivered -0.10% and MUSA delivered 22.75% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CarMax, Inc. (KMX) vs Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA)

A side-by-side comparison of CarMax, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 17, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KMX

CarMax, Inc.

$8.31B

$58.53Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MUSA

Murphy USA Inc.

$10.82B

$586.06Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 17, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KMX vs MUSA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

KMX +1.3% (+0.1%/yr)MUSA +680.4% (+22.8%/yr)MUSA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

KMX MUSA

KMX vs MUSA: by the numbers

•MUSA is the larger company ($10.82B vs $8.31B market cap).
•MUSA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.34 vs 37.22 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MUSA converts more revenue to profit (2.87% vs 0.84% net margin).
•MUSA grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.42% vs 2.39% CAGR).
•MUSA pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while KMX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMX	MUSA
P/E ratio	37.22	17.34
Forward P/E	22.24	16.89
P/S ratio	0.32	0.49
P/B ratio	1.39	13.49
EV / EBITDA	N/A	10.66
FCF yield	11.67%	5.13%

Profitability

Metric	KMX	MUSA
Gross margin	10.24%	7.26%
Operating margin	-1.85%	4.38%
Net margin	0.84%	2.87%
ROE	3.64%	78.86%
ROIC	-1.10%	14.97%

Dividends

Metric	KMX	MUSA
Dividend yield	N/A	0.43%
Payout ratio	N/A	9.97%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMX	MUSA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.39%	9.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-18.18%	12.97%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.85%	16.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-14.09%	30.72%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMX or MUSA?: MUSA has the lower trailing P/E: KMX trades at 37.22 and MUSA at 17.34. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KMX or MUSA?: Over the past five years, MUSA grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus MUSA at 9.42%.
Does KMX or MUSA pay a bigger dividend?: MUSA pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while KMX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is KMX or MUSA more profitable?: MUSA runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus MUSA at 2.87%.
How have KMX and MUSA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KMX delivered -0.10% and MUSA delivered 22.75% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMX analysis Full MUSA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CarMax P/E ratio Murphy USA P/E ratio Murphy USA dividend yield CarMax ROE Murphy USA ROE CarMax operating margin Murphy USA operating margin CarMax revenue growth Murphy USA revenue growth CarMax free cash flow Murphy USA free cash flow

CarMax & Murphy USA appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 17, 2026.