Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMX or MHK?

MHK has the lower trailing P/E: KMX trades at 35.53 and MHK at 16.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KMX or MHK?

Over the past five years, KMX grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus MHK at 0.62%.

Is KMX or MHK more profitable?

MHK runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus MHK at 4.15%.

How have KMX and MHK total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KMX delivered 1.05% and MHK delivered -4.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CarMax, Inc. (KMX) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)

A side-by-side comparison of CarMax, Inc. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KMX

CarMax, Inc.

$8.12B

$57.21Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$7.63B

$125.16Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KMX vs MHK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

KMX +7.8% (+0.8%/yr)MHK -41.0% (-5.1%/yr)KMX compounded faster over this window

KMX MHK

KMX vs MHK: by the numbers

•KMX is the larger company ($8.12B vs $7.63B market cap).
•MHK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.58 vs 35.53 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MHK converts more revenue to profit (4.15% vs 0.84% net margin).
•KMX grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.39% vs 0.62% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMX	MHK
P/E ratio	35.53	16.58
Forward P/E	21.13	12.71
P/S ratio	0.31	0.68
P/B ratio	1.33	0.89
EV / EBITDA	N/A	7.08
FCF yield	12.25%	10.64%

Profitability

Metric	KMX	MHK
Gross margin	10.24%	24.65%
Operating margin	-1.85%	5.39%
Net margin	0.84%	4.15%
ROE	3.64%	5.43%
ROIC	-1.21%	4.46%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMX	MHK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.39%	0.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-18.18%	-3.82%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.85%	-6.69%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-14.54%	-7.54%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMX or MHK?: MHK has the lower trailing P/E: KMX trades at 35.53 and MHK at 16.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KMX or MHK?: Over the past five years, KMX grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus MHK at 0.62%.
Is KMX or MHK more profitable?: MHK runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus MHK at 4.15%.
How have KMX and MHK total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KMX delivered 1.05% and MHK delivered -4.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMX analysis Full MHK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CarMax P/E ratio Mohawk Industries P/E ratio CarMax ROE Mohawk Industries ROE CarMax operating margin Mohawk Industries operating margin CarMax revenue growth Mohawk Industries revenue growth CarMax free cash flow Mohawk Industries free cash flow

CarMax & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.