Is KMX or MHK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MHK is cheaper: KMX trades at a 32.77 P/E and MHK at 17.96.

Which has grown faster, KMX or MHK?

Over the past five years, KMX grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.

Is KMX or MHK more profitable?

MHK runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus MHK at 3.77%.

Which has been the better investment, KMX or MHK?

Over the past 10-year, KMX delivered the higher annualized total return — KMX at 1.31% versus MHK at -4.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CarMax, Inc. (KMX) vs Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)

MHK leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of CarMax, Inc. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

KMX

CarMax, Inc.

$7.49B

$52.76Consumer Cyclical

MHK

Mohawk Industries, Inc.

$7.30B

$119.76Consumer Cyclical

Total return — KMX vs MHK

growth of $100 · last 29y

KMX +399.5%MHK +599.3%MHK compounded faster

KMX MHK

KMX vs MHK: by the numbers

•KMX is the larger company ($7.49B vs $7.30B market cap).
•MHK trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.96 vs 32.77 P/E).
•MHK converts more revenue to profit (3.77% vs 0.84% net margin).
•KMX grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.39% vs 2.03% CAGR).

Which is better, KMX or MHK?

Metric tally: KMX 4 · MHK 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMHK(lower P/E)

GrowthKMX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMHK(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMX	MHK
P/E ratio	32.77	17.96●
Forward P/E	19.58	13.95●
P/S ratio	0.28●	0.67
P/B ratio	1.23	0.88●
EV / EBITDA	—	7.40
FCF yield	13.26%●	9.60%

Profitability

Metric	KMX	MHK
Gross margin	10.24%	24.34%●
Operating margin	-1.85%	4.89%●
Net margin	0.84%	3.77%●
ROE	3.64%	4.95%●
ROIC	-1.10%	3.54%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMX	MHK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.39%●	2.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-18.18%	-3.82%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.85%●	-12.83%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-16.16%	-9.35%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, KMX or MHK?: It depends on your goal. value: MHK (lower P/E); growth: KMX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MHK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MHK leads 10 to 4.
Is KMX or MHK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MHK is cheaper: KMX trades at a 32.77 P/E and MHK at 17.96.
Which has grown faster, KMX or MHK?: Over the past five years, KMX grew revenue faster — KMX at a 2.39% CAGR versus MHK at 2.03%.
Is KMX or MHK more profitable?: MHK runs the higher net margin — KMX at 0.84% versus MHK at 3.77%.
Which has been the better investment, KMX or MHK?: Over the past 10-year, KMX delivered the higher annualized total return — KMX at 1.31% versus MHK at -4.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMX analysis Full MHK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CarMax P/E ratio Mohawk Industries P/E ratio CarMax dividend yield Mohawk Industries dividend yield CarMax ROE Mohawk Industries ROE CarMax operating margin Mohawk Industries operating margin CarMax revenue growth Mohawk Industries revenue growth CarMax free cash flow Mohawk Industries free cash flow

CarMax & Mohawk Industries appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.