Which has grown faster, KMDA or NEO?

Over the past five years, KMDA grew revenue faster — KMDA at a 10.59% CAGR versus NEO at 9.41%.

Does KMDA or NEO pay a bigger dividend?

KMDA pays a dividend (5.25% yield), while NEO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is KMDA or NEO more profitable?

KMDA runs the higher net margin — KMDA at 11.60% versus NEO at -6.77%.

How have KMDA and NEO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KMDA delivered 5.44% and NEO delivered 8.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kamada Ltd. (KMDA) vs NeoGenomics, Inc. (NEO)

A side-by-side comparison of Kamada Ltd. and NeoGenomics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KMDA

Kamada Ltd.

$474M

$8.22HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:54 AM EDT

NEO

NeoGenomics, Inc.

$438M

$17.07HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:55 AM EDT

Total return — KMDA vs NEO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

KMDA +68.8% (+5.4%/yr)NEO +134.5% (+8.9%/yr)NEO compounded faster over this window

KMDA NEO

KMDA vs NEO: by the numbers

•KMDA is the larger company ($474M vs $438M market cap).
•KMDA is profitable (11.60% net margin) while NEO runs a net loss (-6.77%).
•KMDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.59% vs 9.41% CAGR).
•KMDA pays a dividend (5.25% yield), while NEO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMDA	NEO
P/E ratio	21.69	N/A
Forward P/E	17.21	93.39
P/S ratio	2.47	0.57
P/B ratio	1.76	0.56
EV / EBITDA	10.59	N/A
FCF yield	5.58%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	KMDA	NEO
Gross margin	40.82%	42.92%
Operating margin	14.51%	-8.63%
Net margin	11.60%	-6.77%
ROE	8.25%	-6.60%
ROIC	6.95%	-5.29%

Dividends

Metric	KMDA	NEO
Dividend yield	5.25%	N/A
Payout ratio	110.82%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMDA	NEO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.59%	9.41%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-1.98%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	40.37%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.36%	-15.14%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, KMDA or NEO?: Over the past five years, KMDA grew revenue faster — KMDA at a 10.59% CAGR versus NEO at 9.41%.
Does KMDA or NEO pay a bigger dividend?: KMDA pays a dividend (5.25% yield), while NEO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is KMDA or NEO more profitable?: KMDA runs the higher net margin — KMDA at 11.60% versus NEO at -6.77%.
How have KMDA and NEO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KMDA delivered 5.44% and NEO delivered 8.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMDA analysis Full NEO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kamada P/E ratio Kamada dividend yield Kamada ROE NeoGenomics ROE Kamada operating margin NeoGenomics operating margin Kamada revenue growth NeoGenomics revenue growth Kamada free cash flow NeoGenomics free cash flow

Kamada & NeoGenomics appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.