Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Verisk Analytics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive; VRSK is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$113.09Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
$212.26TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs VRSK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 17yKMB +249.7%VRSK +698.7%VRSK compounded faster
KMB VRSK
KMB vs VRSK: by the numbers
- •KMB is the larger company ($37.54B vs $27.81B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.49 vs 31.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •VRSK converts more revenue to profit (29.34% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •VRSK grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.92% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.56% vs 0.92%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.49 | 31.46 |
| Forward P/E | 14.81 | 26.96 |
| P/S ratio | 2.25 | 9.01 |
| P/B ratio | 20.67 | 92.99 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 3.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.38 | 18.83 |
| FCF yield | 6.94% | 4.03% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 67.44% |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 44.87% |
| Net margin | 12.81% | 29.34% |
| ROE | 117.98% | 293.95% |
| ROIC | 17.41% | 19.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.56% | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | 29.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 1.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 8.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | 4.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.34% | 2.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or VRSK?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 17.49 and VRSK at 31.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or VRSK?
- Over the past five years, VRSK grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.
- Does KMB or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.56% and VRSK yields 0.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or VRSK more profitable?
- VRSK runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus VRSK at 29.34%.
- How have KMB and VRSK total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 2.16% and VRSK delivered 9.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioVerisk Analytics P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldVerisk Analytics dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEVerisk Analytics ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginVerisk Analytics operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthVerisk Analytics revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowVerisk Analytics free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Verisk Analytics appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.