Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Target Corporation (TGT)
KMB leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
TGT
Target Corporation
$135.23Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare KMB and TGT.
KMB vs TGT: by the numbers
- •TGT is the larger company ($61.42B vs $33.95B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 17.86 P/E).
- •KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 3.24% net margin).
- •TGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.62% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 3.37%).
Which is better, KMB or TGT?
Metric tally: KMB 11 · TGT 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthTGT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.06● | 17.86 |
| Forward P/E | 13.49● | 15.09 |
| P/S ratio | 2.06 | 0.58● |
| P/B ratio | 18.98 | 3.76● |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.26 | 7.81● |
| FCF yield | 7.56%● | 6.75% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86%● | 28.14% |
| Operating margin | 13.27%● | 4.49% |
| Net margin | 12.81%● | 3.24% |
| ROE | 117.98%● | 21.04% |
| ROIC | 17.62%● | 9.76% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.97%● | 3.37% |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | 55.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 1.62%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | -1.34%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.38%● | -12.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.94%● | -7.66% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KMB or TGT?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: TGT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KMB leads 11 to 5.
- Is KMB or TGT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.06 P/E and TGT at 17.86.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or TGT?
- Over the past five years, TGT grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus TGT at 1.62%.
- Does KMB or TGT pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.97% and TGT yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or TGT more profitable?
- KMB runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus TGT at 3.24%.
- Which has been the better investment, KMB or TGT?
- Over the past 10-year, TGT delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.05% versus TGT at 10.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioTarget P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldTarget dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROETarget ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginTarget operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthTarget revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowTarget free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Target appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.