Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or TGT?

KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 17.16 and TGT at 19.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KMB or TGT?

Over the past five years, TGT grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus TGT at -0.29%.

Does KMB or TGT pay a bigger dividend?

KMB yields 4.65% and TGT yields 3.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is KMB or TGT more profitable?

KMB runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus TGT at 3.24%.

How have KMB and TGT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.83% and TGT delivered 10.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Target Corporation (TGT)

A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

$36.28B

$109.31Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

TGT

Target Corporation

$65.62B

$144.47Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KMB vs TGT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

KMB +682.6%TGT +3459.5%TGT compounded faster

KMB TGT

KMB vs TGT: by the numbers

•TGT is the larger company ($65.62B vs $36.28B market cap).
•KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.16 vs 19.09 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 3.24% net margin).
•TGT grew revenue faster over the past five years (-0.29% vs -2.61% CAGR).
•KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.65% vs 3.16%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMB	TGT
P/E ratio	17.16	19.09
Forward P/E	14.53	19.79
P/S ratio	2.20	0.62
P/B ratio	20.28	4.02
EV / EBITDA	15.13	10.22
FCF yield	7.08%	4.75%

Profitability

Metric	KMB	TGT
Gross margin	35.86%	28.14%
Operating margin	13.27%	4.49%
Net margin	12.81%	3.24%
ROE	117.98%	21.04%
ROIC	17.41%	9.76%

Dividends

Metric	KMB	TGT
Dividend yield	4.65%	3.16%
Payout ratio	83.55%	55.88%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMB	TGT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-2.61%	-0.29%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-2.50%	-1.34%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-8.19%	-17.01%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.52%	-8.34%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or TGT?: KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 17.16 and TGT at 19.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KMB or TGT?: Over the past five years, TGT grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus TGT at -0.29%.
Does KMB or TGT pay a bigger dividend?: KMB yields 4.65% and TGT yields 3.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KMB or TGT more profitable?: KMB runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus TGT at 3.24%.
How have KMB and TGT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.83% and TGT delivered 10.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMB analysis Full TGT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio Target P/E ratio Kimberly-Clark dividend yield Target dividend yield Kimberly-Clark ROE Target ROE Kimberly-Clark operating margin Target operating margin Kimberly-Clark revenue growth Target revenue growth Kimberly-Clark free cash flow Target free cash flow

Kimberly-Clark & Target appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 1, 2026.