Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)
PM leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though KMB is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$109.37Consumer Defensive
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$180.77Consumer Defensive
Total return — KMB vs PM
growth of $100 · last 18yKMB +80.4%PM +266.0%PM compounded faster
KMB PM
KMB vs PM: by the numbers
- •PM is the larger company ($281.74B vs $36.30B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.17 vs 25.42 P/E).
- •PM converts more revenue to profit (26.74% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •PM grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.68% vs 3.25%).
Which is better, KMB or PM?
Metric tally: KMB 7 · PM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthPM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityPM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | PM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.17● | 25.42 |
| Forward P/E | 14.44● | 19.81 |
| P/S ratio | 2.20● | 6.81 |
| P/B ratio | 20.29 | — |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.14● | 19.01 |
| FCF yield | 7.07%● | 3.78% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 67.30%● |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 36.83%● |
| Net margin | 12.81% | 26.74%● |
| ROE | 117.98%● | -113.55% |
| ROIC | 17.41% | 25.56%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.68%● | 3.25% |
| Payout ratio | 84.21% | 80.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 7.34%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 7.10%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 4.58%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.12% | 17.89%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KMB or PM?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: PM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: PM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PM leads 8 to 7.
- Is KMB or PM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 17.17 P/E and PM at 25.42.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or PM?
- Over the past five years, PM grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus PM at 7.34%.
- Does KMB or PM pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.68% and PM yields 3.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or PM more profitable?
- PM runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus PM at 26.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, KMB or PM?
- Over the past 10-year, PM delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.72% versus PM at 11.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioPhilip Morris International P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldPhilip Morris International dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEPhilip Morris International ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginPhilip Morris International operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthPhilip Morris International revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowPhilip Morris International free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.