Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.43Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$190.48Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs PM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKMB +9.2% (+0.9%/yr)PM +218.6% (+12.3%/yr)PM compounded faster over this window
KMB PM
KMB vs PM: by the numbers
- •PM is the larger company ($296.88B vs $32.67B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.74 vs 27.37 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PM converts more revenue to profit (25.56% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •PM grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.19% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.20% vs 3.08%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | PM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.74 | 27.37 |
| Forward P/E | 13.27 | 22.75 |
| P/S ratio | 1.97 | 6.98 |
| P/B ratio | 18.67 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.48 | 18.78 |
| FCF yield | 5.38% | 4.29% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.69% | 67.51% |
| Operating margin | 12.38% | 37.75% |
| Net margin | 11.80% | 25.56% |
| ROE | 111.71% | N/A |
| ROIC | 12.46% | 26.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.20% | 3.08% |
| Payout ratio | 86.73% | 84.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 7.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 7.10% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | 4.43% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.75% | 18.46% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or PM?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.74 and PM at 27.37. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or PM?
- Over the past five years, PM grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.
- Does KMB or PM pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 5.20% and PM yields 3.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or PM more profitable?
- PM runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus PM at 25.56%.
- How have KMB and PM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.32% and PM delivered 12.40% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioPhilip Morris International P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldPhilip Morris International dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEPhilip Morris International ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginPhilip Morris International operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthPhilip Morris International revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowPhilip Morris International free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.