Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive; PDI is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.43Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
$14.00Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs PDI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKMB +9.2% (+0.9%/yr)PDI +69.5% (+5.4%/yr)PDI compounded faster over this window
KMB PDI
KMB vs PDI: by the numbers
- •KMB is the larger company ($32.67B vs $6.46B market cap).
- •PDI converts more revenue to profit (64.09% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •PDI grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.34% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •PDI pays the higher dividend yield (17.93% vs 5.20%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.74 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 13.27 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 1.97 | N/A |
| P/B ratio | 18.67 | 0.86 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.48 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 5.38% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.69% | 87.09% |
| Operating margin | 12.38% | 78.88% |
| Net margin | 11.80% | 64.09% |
| ROE | 111.71% | 7.79% |
| ROIC | 12.46% | N/A |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.20% | 17.93% |
| Payout ratio | 86.73% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 22.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | -22.73% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.75% | 1.79% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, KMB or PDI?
- Over the past five years, PDI grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus PDI at 22.34%.
- Does KMB or PDI pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 5.20% and PDI yields 17.93% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or PDI more profitable?
- PDI runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus PDI at 64.09%.
- How have KMB and PDI total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.32% and PDI delivered 5.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthPIMCO Dynamic Income Fund revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.