Is KLAC or TXN cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TXN is cheaper: KLAC trades at a 72.05 P/E and TXN at 51.47.

Which has grown faster, KLAC or TXN?

Over the past five years, KLAC grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 15.21% CAGR versus TXN at 3.64%.

Does KLAC or TXN pay a bigger dividend?

KLAC yields 3.14% and TXN yields 1.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is KLAC or TXN more profitable?

KLAC runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.66% versus TXN at 29.11%.

Which has been the better investment, KLAC or TXN?

Over the past 10-year, KLAC delivered the higher annualized total return — KLAC at 67.44% versus TXN at 20.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

KLAC leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics, though TXN is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of KLA Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Texas Instruments Incorporated

$274.05B

$301.12Technology

Total return — KLAC vs TXN

growth of $100 · last 30y

KLAC +19330.5%TXN +4434.9%KLAC compounded faster

KLAC TXN

KLAC vs TXN: by the numbers

•KLAC is the larger company ($332.50B vs $274.05B market cap).
•TXN trades at the lower earnings multiple (51.47 vs 72.05 P/E).
•KLAC converts more revenue to profit (35.66% vs 29.11% net margin).
•KLAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.21% vs 3.64% CAGR).
•KLAC pays the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 1.87%).

Which is better, KLAC or TXN?

Metric tally: KLAC 11 · TXN 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTXN(lower P/E)

GrowthKLAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeKLAC(higher dividend yield)

QualityKLAC(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	KLAC	TXN
P/E ratio	72.05	51.47●
Forward P/E	—	33.83
P/S ratio	25.61	14.93●
P/B ratio	57.52	16.40●
PEG ratio	0.06●	7.87
EV / EBITDA	57.56	34.60●
FCF yield	1.20%	1.35%●

Profitability

Metric	KLAC	TXN
Gross margin	61.75%●	57.32%
Operating margin	42.08%●	35.29%
Net margin	35.66%●	29.11%
ROE	80.11%●	31.99%
ROIC	38.11%●	16.46%

Dividends

Metric	KLAC	TXN
Dividend yield	3.14%●	1.87%
Payout ratio	262.04%	103.12%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KLAC	TXN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.21%●	3.64%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	31.52%●	-2.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.49%●	-10.12%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	67.17%●	12.95%

Frequently asked

Which is better, KLAC or TXN?: It depends on your goal. value: TXN (lower P/E); growth: KLAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KLAC (higher dividend yield); quality: KLAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KLAC leads 11 to 5.
Is KLAC or TXN cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TXN is cheaper: KLAC trades at a 72.05 P/E and TXN at 51.47.
Which has grown faster, KLAC or TXN?: Over the past five years, KLAC grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 15.21% CAGR versus TXN at 3.64%.
Does KLAC or TXN pay a bigger dividend?: KLAC yields 3.14% and TXN yields 1.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KLAC or TXN more profitable?: KLAC runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.66% versus TXN at 29.11%.
Which has been the better investment, KLAC or TXN?: Over the past 10-year, KLAC delivered the higher annualized total return — KLAC at 67.44% versus TXN at 20.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KLAC analysis Full TXN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

KLA P/E ratio Texas Instruments P/E ratio KLA dividend yield Texas Instruments dividend yield KLA ROE Texas Instruments ROE KLA operating margin Texas Instruments operating margin KLA revenue growth Texas Instruments revenue growth KLA free cash flow Texas Instruments free cash flow

KLA & Texas Instruments appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.