Which has the lower trailing P/E, KLAC or PLTR?

KLAC has the lower trailing P/E: KLAC trades at 56.45 and PLTR at 159.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KLAC or PLTR?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 14.44% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.

Does KLAC or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?

KLAC pays a dividend (0.41% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is KLAC or PLTR more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.57% versus PLTR at 49.00%.

How have KLAC and PLTR total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, KLAC delivered 45.30% and PLTR delivered 50.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

A side-by-side comparison of KLA Corporation and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KLAC

KLA Corporation

$270.26B

$206.89TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$433.38B

$188.75TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KLAC vs PLTR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

KLAC +1035.2% (+49.9%/yr)PLTR +1886.8% (+64.6%/yr)PLTR compounded faster over this window

KLAC PLTR

KLAC vs PLTR: by the numbers

•PLTR is the larger company ($433.38B vs $270.26B market cap).
•KLAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (56.45 vs 159.96 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (49.00% vs 35.57% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (35.90% vs 14.44% CAGR).
•KLAC pays a dividend (0.41% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KLAC	PLTR
P/E ratio	56.45	159.96
Forward P/E	37.60	118.11
PEG ratio	2.53	N/A
P/S ratio	19.90	70.40
P/B ratio	42.56	44.34
EV / EBITDA	45.38	162.08
FCF yield	1.39%	0.78%

Profitability

Metric	KLAC	PLTR
Gross margin	61.30%	84.80%
Operating margin	41.69%	31.59%
Net margin	35.57%	49.00%
ROE	76.08%	30.86%
ROIC	35.75%	25.60%

Dividends

Metric	KLAC	PLTR
Dividend yield	0.41%	N/A
Payout ratio	22.92%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KLAC	PLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.44%	35.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	22.23%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.04%	122.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	45.30%	50.62%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KLAC or PLTR?: KLAC has the lower trailing P/E: KLAC trades at 56.45 and PLTR at 159.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KLAC or PLTR?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 14.44% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.
Does KLAC or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?: KLAC pays a dividend (0.41% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is KLAC or PLTR more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.57% versus PLTR at 49.00%.
How have KLAC and PLTR total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, KLAC delivered 45.30% and PLTR delivered 50.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KLAC analysis Full PLTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

KLA P/E ratio Palantir Technologies P/E ratio KLA dividend yield KLA ROE Palantir Technologies ROE KLA operating margin Palantir Technologies operating margin KLA revenue growth Palantir Technologies revenue growth KLA free cash flow Palantir Technologies free cash flow

KLA & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.