Which has the lower trailing P/E, KLAC or MANH?

KLAC has the lower trailing P/E: KLAC trades at 49.29 and MANH at 57.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KLAC or MANH?

Over the past five years, KLAC grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 14.44% CAGR versus MANH at 12.69%.

Does KLAC or MANH pay a bigger dividend?

KLAC pays a dividend (0.47% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is KLAC or MANH more profitable?

KLAC runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.57% versus MANH at 18.67%.

How have KLAC and MANH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KLAC delivered 40.45% and MANH delivered 13.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

KLA Corporation (KLAC) vs Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)

A side-by-side comparison of KLA Corporation and Manhattan Associates, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KLAC

KLA Corporation

$235.97B

$180.64TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MANH

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

$11.77B

$201.82TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KLAC vs MANH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

KLAC +2853.2% (+40.3%/yr)MANH +233.0% (+12.8%/yr)KLAC compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

KLAC MANH

KLAC vs MANH: by the numbers

•KLAC is the larger company ($235.97B vs $11.77B market cap).
•KLAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (49.29 vs 57.83 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•KLAC converts more revenue to profit (35.57% vs 18.67% net margin).
•KLAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.44% vs 12.69% CAGR).
•KLAC pays a dividend (0.47% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KLAC	MANH
P/E ratio	49.29	57.83
Forward P/E	32.91	36.71
P/S ratio	17.38	10.45
P/B ratio	37.16	74.71
EV / EBITDA	39.72	41.45
FCF yield	1.60%	3.39%

Profitability

Metric	KLAC	MANH
Gross margin	61.30%	54.65%
Operating margin	41.69%	24.33%
Net margin	35.57%	18.67%
ROE	76.08%	133.48%
ROIC	35.75%	90.92%

Dividends

Metric	KLAC	MANH
Dividend yield	0.47%	N/A
Payout ratio	22.92%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KLAC	MANH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.44%	12.69%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	22.23%	21.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.04%	19.51%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	39.61%	4.78%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KLAC or MANH?: KLAC has the lower trailing P/E: KLAC trades at 49.29 and MANH at 57.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KLAC or MANH?: Over the past five years, KLAC grew revenue faster — KLAC at a 14.44% CAGR versus MANH at 12.69%.
Does KLAC or MANH pay a bigger dividend?: KLAC pays a dividend (0.47% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is KLAC or MANH more profitable?: KLAC runs the higher net margin — KLAC at 35.57% versus MANH at 18.67%.
How have KLAC and MANH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KLAC delivered 40.45% and MANH delivered 13.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KLAC analysis Full MANH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

KLA P/E ratio Manhattan Associates P/E ratio KLA dividend yield KLA ROE Manhattan Associates ROE KLA operating margin Manhattan Associates operating margin KLA revenue growth Manhattan Associates revenue growth KLA free cash flow Manhattan Associates free cash flow

KLA & Manhattan Associates appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.