KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) vs Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC)
KKR leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though MMC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of KKR & Co. Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KKR
KKR & Co. Inc.
$96.24Financial Services
MMC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
$171.14Financial Services
Total return — KKR vs MMC
growth of $100 · last 19yKKR +361.5%MMC +448.3%MMC compounded faster
KKR MMC
KKR vs MMC: by the numbers
- •MMC is the larger company ($89.82B vs $86.41B market cap).
- •MMC trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.30 vs 32.30 P/E).
- •KKR converts more revenue to profit (14.82% vs 14.26% net margin).
- •KKR grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.34% vs 9.28% CAGR).
- •MMC pays the higher dividend yield (2.10% vs 0.78%).
Which is better, KKR or MMC?
Metric tally: KKR 9 · MMC 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMMC(lower P/E)
GrowthKKR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMMC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMMC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KKR | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.30 | 20.30● |
| Forward P/E | 15.97● | 16.60 |
| P/S ratio | 4.59 | 3.11● |
| P/B ratio | 3.01● | 5.48 |
| PEG ratio | — | 7.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.78● | 14.59 |
| FCF yield | 7.51%● | 5.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | KKR | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.75%● | 20.12% |
| Operating margin | 16.29% | 21.70%● |
| Net margin | 14.82%● | 14.26% |
| ROE | 9.71% | 26.51%● |
| ROIC | 0.10% | 12.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KKR | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 2.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 29.88% | 42.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KKR | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.34%● | 9.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.16% | 16.34%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 48.48%● | 8.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.17%● | 10.12% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KKR or MMC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MMC (lower P/E); growth: KKR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MMC (higher dividend yield); quality: MMC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KKR leads 9 to 7.
- Is KKR or MMC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MMC is cheaper: KKR trades at a 32.30 P/E and MMC at 20.30.
- Which has grown faster, KKR or MMC?
- Over the past five years, KKR grew revenue faster — KKR at a 15.34% CAGR versus MMC at 9.28%.
- Does KKR or MMC pay a bigger dividend?
- KKR yields 0.78% and MMC yields 2.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KKR or MMC more profitable?
- KKR runs the higher net margin — KKR at 14.82% versus MMC at 14.26%.
- Which has been the better investment, KKR or MMC?
- Over the past 10-year, KKR delivered the higher annualized total return — KKR at 23.88% versus MMC at 13.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
KKR & P/E ratioMarsh & McLennan Companies P/E ratioKKR & dividend yieldMarsh & McLennan Companies dividend yieldKKR & ROEMarsh & McLennan Companies ROEKKR & operating marginMarsh & McLennan Companies operating marginKKR & revenue growthMarsh & McLennan Companies revenue growthKKR & free cash flowMarsh & McLennan Companies free cash flow
KKR & & Marsh & McLennan Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.