Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) vs Weyerhaeuser Company (WY)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimco Realty Corporation and Weyerhaeuser Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — KIM vs WY
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKIM vs WY: by the numbers
- •WY is the larger company ($16.36B vs $16.02B market cap).
- •KIM converts more revenue to profit (27.73% vs 6.84% net margin).
- •KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.73% vs -6.82% CAGR).
- •KIM pays the higher dividend yield (4.36% vs 3.65%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KIM | WY |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.52 | 34.88 |
| Forward P/E | 28.17 | 70.06 |
| P/S ratio | 7.25 | 2.41 |
| P/B ratio | 1.55 | 1.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.06 | 19.78 |
| FCF yield | 5.41% | N/A |
For REITs like Kimco Realty Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Weyerhaeuser Company, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | KIM | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.85% | 13.24% |
| Operating margin | 35.80% | 8.38% |
| Net margin | 27.73% | 6.84% |
| ROE | 5.91% | 4.99% |
| ROIC | 3.95% | 3.67% |
Dividends
| Metric | KIM | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.36% | 3.65% |
| Payout ratio | 115.73% | 127.27% |
Kimco Realty Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Weyerhaeuser Company's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KIM | WY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.73% | -6.82% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -18.16% | -15.91% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.82% | -17.08% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.06% | -5.57% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, KIM or WY?
- Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — KIM at a 14.73% CAGR versus WY at -6.82%.
- Does KIM or WY pay a bigger dividend?
- KIM yields 4.36% and WY yields 3.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KIM or WY more profitable?
- KIM runs the higher net margin — KIM at 27.73% versus WY at 6.84%.
- How have KIM and WY total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KIM delivered 2.63% and WY delivered 0.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimco Realty & Weyerhaeuser appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 8, 2026.