Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) vs Vivmark Residential (VMRK)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimco Realty Corporation and Vivmark Residential across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — KIM vs VMRK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKIM vs VMRK: by the numbers
- •VMRK is the larger company ($22.42B vs $15.00B market cap).
- •VMRK converts more revenue to profit (27.91% vs 27.73% net margin).
- •KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.73% vs 5.22% CAGR).
- •KIM pays the higher dividend yield (4.77% vs 3.52%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KIM | VMRK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.99 | 26.22 |
| Forward P/E | 26.44 | 47.17 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 5.15 |
| P/S ratio | 6.86 | 7.15 |
| P/B ratio | 1.46 | 2.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.45 | 16.39 |
| FCF yield | 5.72% | 5.24% |
For REITs like Kimco Realty Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Vivmark Residential, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | KIM | VMRK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.85% | 45.96% |
| Operating margin | 35.80% | 36.33% |
| Net margin | 27.73% | 27.91% |
| ROE | 5.91% | 8.32% |
| ROIC | 3.95% | 4.45% |
Dividends
| Metric | KIM | VMRK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.77% | 3.52% |
| Payout ratio | 119.10% | 92.00% |
Kimco Realty Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Vivmark Residential's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KIM | VMRK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.73% | 5.22% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -18.16% | 4.71% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.82% | 2.37% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.00% | -2.27% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, KIM or VMRK?
- Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — KIM at a 14.73% CAGR versus VMRK at 5.22%.
- Does KIM or VMRK pay a bigger dividend?
- KIM yields 4.77% and VMRK yields 3.52% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KIM or VMRK more profitable?
- VMRK runs the higher net margin — KIM at 27.73% versus VMRK at 27.91%.
- How have KIM and VMRK total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KIM delivered 2.43% and VMRK delivered 2.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimco Realty & Vivmark Residential appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.