Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) vs SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimco Realty Corporation and SBA Communications Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — KIM vs SBAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKIM vs SBAC: by the numbers
- •SBAC is the larger company ($19.67B vs $15.64B market cap).
- •SBAC converts more revenue to profit (34.51% vs 27.73% net margin).
- •KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.73% vs 5.63% CAGR).
- •KIM pays the higher dividend yield (4.42% vs 2.53%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KIM | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.06 | 19.96 |
| Forward P/E | 27.69 | 24.09 |
| P/S ratio | 7.15 | 6.85 |
| P/B ratio | 1.52 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.91 | 18.58 |
| FCF yield | 5.48% | 5.34% |
For REITs like Kimco Realty Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like SBA Communications Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | KIM | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.85% | 41.61% |
| Operating margin | 35.80% | 50.79% |
| Net margin | 27.73% | 34.51% |
| ROE | 5.91% | N/A |
| ROIC | 3.95% | 11.87% |
Dividends
| Metric | KIM | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 2.53% |
| Payout ratio | 115.73% | 50.81% |
Kimco Realty Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
SBA Communications Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KIM | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.73% | 5.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -18.16% | 115.83% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.82% | 1.35% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.61% | -10.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, KIM or SBAC?
- Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — KIM at a 14.73% CAGR versus SBAC at 5.63%.
- Does KIM or SBAC pay a bigger dividend?
- KIM yields 4.42% and SBAC yields 2.53% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KIM or SBAC more profitable?
- SBAC runs the higher net margin — KIM at 27.73% versus SBAC at 34.51%.
- How have KIM and SBAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KIM delivered 2.91% and SBAC delivered 6.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimco Realty & SBA Communications appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.