Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) vs Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimco Realty Corporation and Lamar Advertising Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — KIM vs LAMR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKIM vs LAMR: by the numbers
- •KIM is the larger company ($14.93B vs $14.69B market cap).
- •KIM converts more revenue to profit (27.73% vs 23.90% net margin).
- •KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.73% vs 7.37% CAGR).
- •KIM pays the higher dividend yield (4.81% vs 4.62%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KIM | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.88 | 26.41 |
| Forward P/E | 26.22 | 24.46 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.38 |
| P/S ratio | 6.83 | 6.31 |
| P/B ratio | 1.45 | 14.75 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.40 | 19.85 |
| FCF yield | 5.74% | 5.14% |
For REITs like Kimco Realty Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
For REITs like Lamar Advertising Company, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | KIM | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.85% | 40.67% |
| Operating margin | 35.80% | 27.97% |
| Net margin | 27.73% | 23.90% |
| ROE | 5.91% | 55.86% |
| ROIC | 3.95% | 9.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | KIM | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.81% | 4.62% |
| Payout ratio | 119.10% | 121.35% |
Kimco Realty Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Lamar Advertising Company's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KIM | LAMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 14.73% | 7.37% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -18.16% | 19.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.82% | 5.51% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.08% | 9.88% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, KIM or LAMR?
- Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — KIM at a 14.73% CAGR versus LAMR at 7.37%.
- Does KIM or LAMR pay a bigger dividend?
- KIM yields 4.81% and LAMR yields 4.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KIM or LAMR more profitable?
- KIM runs the higher net margin — KIM at 27.73% versus LAMR at 23.90%.
- How have KIM and LAMR total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KIM delivered 2.66% and LAMR delivered 13.51% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimco Realty & Lamar Advertising appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.